05.07.2013 Views

BSA Flow Software Installation and User's Guide - CSI

BSA Flow Software Installation and User's Guide - CSI

BSA Flow Software Installation and User's Guide - CSI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The mean values of u(t) <strong>and</strong> v(t) are subtracted to improve calculation<br />

accuracy, ensuring that large DC-components do not drown small<br />

fluctuations. This will produce U(0,T)=V(0,T)=0, <strong>and</strong> consequently<br />

Suv(0)=0 corresponding to (7-65) without the delta function δ(f).<br />

In principle the Fourier transforms should be calculated integrating from -∞<br />

to +∞, but in practice you always sample the signals over a limited period of<br />

time, as indicated by the finite limits of the integrations in (7-67). Provided<br />

the sampling period is much longer than the largest time scale you wish to<br />

investigate, this will be of little significance.<br />

Spectrum estimator Since both u(t) <strong>and</strong> v(t) are real, U(-f, T) equals U*(f, T), with U*<br />

representing the complex conjugate of U. Exploiting this <strong>and</strong> omitting the<br />

limiting <strong>and</strong> expectation operations in (7-66), the spectral density function<br />

Suv(f) can be estimated from U(f, T) <strong>and</strong> V(f, T) directly:<br />

$ *<br />

Suv ( f)<br />

= U ( f, T) V( f, T)<br />

T 1<br />

(7-68)<br />

Correlation estimator Once the spectral density has been estimated, inverse Fourier transformation<br />

yield an estimate of the covariance:<br />

∞<br />

∫<br />

C ( τ)<br />

= S ( f) e<br />

uv uv<br />

−∞<br />

i2πf τ<br />

df (7-69)<br />

-from which the correlation can be calculated using (7-57):<br />

R ( τ) = C ( τ)<br />

+ uv<br />

uv uv<br />

Digital calculations based on discrete samples<br />

The definitions of correlations <strong>and</strong> spectra are based on the assumed<br />

knowledge of the true continuous signals u(t) <strong>and</strong> v(t), but in a real LDAexperiment<br />

time history records are not continuous. We get a velocitysample<br />

whenever a seeding particle passes through the measuring volume.<br />

This happens with r<strong>and</strong>om time intervals, providing a discrete representation<br />

of the time history with arrival times in sequence, but with varying<br />

interarrival times:<br />

{ ut ( i), vt ( i)| ( i= 0, , N−1) ∧( 0≤ ti ≤ ti+ 1 ≤T)<br />

}<br />

K (7-70)<br />

Without knowledge of the true continuous signals u(t) <strong>and</strong> v(t) we can only<br />

estimate the spectra Suv(f). The estimates are usually fairly good at low<br />

frequencies, but tends to deviate r<strong>and</strong>omly at frequencies significantly above<br />

the average sample rate.<br />

In theory the r<strong>and</strong>om sampling allow us to determine spectra Suv(f) at very<br />

high frequencies, since there is a nonzero probability that samples will occur<br />

at time intervals smaller than the mean, thereby providing information on the<br />

high frequency components of the signal.<br />

In practice it proves difficult to get satisfactory results at frequencies<br />

significantly higher than the mean data rate, because the variance of the<br />

estimated spectra becomes very large unless extremely long sampling times<br />

are used.<br />

<strong>BSA</strong> <strong>Flow</strong> <strong>Software</strong>:Reference guide 7-125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!