11.08.2012 Views

AVIS DE DROIT PROTECTION DES SIGNES NATIONAUX

AVIS DE DROIT PROTECTION DES SIGNES NATIONAUX

AVIS DE DROIT PROTECTION DES SIGNES NATIONAUX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ETATS-UNIS<br />

particularized message was present, and whether the likelihood was great that the message<br />

would be understood by those who viewed it.” 323 If so, we must then ask whether the<br />

governmental regulation (on a state or federal level) of the conduct is related to the<br />

suppression of expression or if the governmental interest to be protected by the statute was<br />

unrelated to the suppression of free expression. If the statute were of the former type, it<br />

would be subject to strict scrutiny. If the statute were of the latter type, the government<br />

would need only show that it furthers an important or substantial governmental interest, and<br />

that the restriction of First Amendment rights is no greater that is essential to the furtherance<br />

of that interest. 324<br />

Any governmental regulation concerning the use and treatment of the flag, then, may have<br />

Constitutional repercussions. In addition to the applicable legislation, there is a substantial<br />

amount of case law (much of which surrounding flag burning as a form of political protest<br />

against the war in Vietnam) concerning the issue. 325<br />

The Flag Code<br />

Either Congress or a state legislature may, under the police power granted by the Constitution,<br />

prohibit or regulate the use of the national flag of the United States. 326 The power to<br />

reasonably regulate usage and display of the flag does not, however, entitle the government to<br />

appropriate the colors red, white and blue and the depiction of stars and stripes. 327 Contentneutral<br />

time, place and manner flag statutes or ordinances which advance substantial<br />

government interests are valid. 328 Federal statutory provisions cover the design of the United<br />

States flag, as well as its display and use. 329<br />

Congress adopted the Flag Code, a guide for all handling and display of the Stars and Stripes,<br />

in 1942. The Federal Flag Code, however, is merely advisory and is not intended to proscribe<br />

conduct. 330 With the exception of 4 U.S.C. § 3, it does not impose penalties for misuse of the<br />

United States Flag. That is left to the states and to the federal government for the District of<br />

Columbia. 331<br />

The Flag Code provides that the flag should not be used as wearing apparel, bedding or<br />

covering for a ceiling, for advertising purposes in any manner whatsoever, nor should<br />

advertising signs be attached to a staff or halyard from which the flag is flown. Similarly a<br />

flag should not be embroidered on a cushion or printed on paper products nor should any part<br />

of the flag be used as a costume or athletic uniform. A flag patch may, however, be affixed to<br />

323<br />

Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, at 405, (1989).<br />

324<br />

See United States v. O’Brian, 391 U.S. 367, 377 (1968).<br />

325<br />

See, e.g. Texas v. Johnson 491 U.S. 397 (1989), United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 (1990).<br />

326<br />

Halter v. State of Nebraska, 205 U.S. 34 (1907).<br />

327<br />

Parker v. Morgan, 322 F. Supp. 585 (W.D.N.C. 1971).<br />

328 th<br />

American Legion Post 7 of Durham, N.C. v. City of Durham, 239 F.3d 601 (4 Cir. 2001) as cited in<br />

36A C.J.S. Flags §3.<br />

329<br />

4 U.S.C. §§ 1-10 available at:<br />

http://www.ushistory.org/betsy/flagetiq.html#5.<br />

See also http://www.suvcw.org/flag.htm.<br />

330 th<br />

Dimmitt v. City of Clearwater, 985 F.2d 1565 (11 Cir. 1993).<br />

331 See “droit regional”, infra.<br />

206

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!