11.08.2012 Views

AVIS DE DROIT PROTECTION DES SIGNES NATIONAUX

AVIS DE DROIT PROTECTION DES SIGNES NATIONAUX

AVIS DE DROIT PROTECTION DES SIGNES NATIONAUX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ETATS-UNIS<br />

December 1997 that it would retain the "all or virtually all" standard. The Commission also<br />

issued an Enforcement Policy Statement on U.S. Origin Claims to provide guidance to<br />

marketers who want to make an unqualified Made in USA claim under the "all or virtually<br />

all" standard and those who want to make a qualified Made in USA claim.<br />

The Federal Trade Commission (or FTC) is an independent agency of the United States<br />

government, established in 1914 by the Federal Trade Commission Act. Its principal mission<br />

is the promotion of consumer protection and the elimination and prevention of anticompetitive<br />

business practices.<br />

The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity theft and other fraud-related complaints into<br />

Consumer Sentinel®, a secure, online database available to hundreds of civil and criminal law<br />

enforcement agencies worldwide. 390<br />

As an example, the FTC’s investigation of Jore Corporation focused on Jore’s use of the<br />

claim “Made in USA” with a depiction of the American flag on packages for power tool<br />

accessories. 391 The FTC alleged that Jore’s ads were deceptive because the use of the phrase<br />

and flag constituted a claim that “all or virtually all” of Jore’s products were made in the<br />

United States, when in fact the products were made with a significant amount of foreign<br />

components or processing. The FTC also alleged that Jore’s use of the qualified claim “Made<br />

in USA with domestic and global components” was deceptive on product in which no<br />

domestic components were used. Jore agreed to an order that requires the filing of periodic<br />

compliance reports and the provision of corporate information. It also includes broad<br />

fencing-in provisions that will result in substantial civil penalties if the company is found to<br />

have deceptively marketed its products in the future. 392<br />

b) Qui demande une intervention?<br />

The Lanham Act gives any person (such as a competitor) who is damaged by a false<br />

designation of origin the right to sue the party making the false claim.<br />

c) Jusqu'où faut-il étendre la protection des signes nationaux<br />

See discussion under § 2(b) infra.<br />

d) Protection des signes nationaux<br />

See discussion under § 2(b) infra.<br />

390 See: https://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CO<strong>DE</strong>=PU01.<br />

391 See Press Release, FTC, Jore Corporation Agrees to Settle Federal Trade Commission Charges of<br />

Making Misleading “Made in USA Claims”, Feb. 6, 2001, available at:<br />

http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2001/02/jore-musa.htm.<br />

392 Gregory F. Noe, John E. Villafranco, and the American Corporate Counsel Association, Patriotic<br />

(and Truthful) Marketing: Substantiating a “Made in USA Claim”, 20 N° 6 ACCA Docket 92.<br />

216

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!