28.12.2013 Views

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Effectiveness of Trivalent Vaccine in Immunizing Young Children<br />

115<br />

An analysis of the results in terms of the overall<br />

patterns of response, the spread of polioviruses<br />

to contacts, and the role of enteroviruses<br />

other than polioviruses will be given by Dr. Paul.<br />

The present discussion will be limited to the<br />

effectiveness of the trivalent vaccine in inducing<br />

infection and immunity in the index children.<br />

A pre-vaccinal virus survey based on tests of two<br />

rectal swabs collected 4-5 days before and on the<br />

day of vaccine ingestion, indicated that 20 of the<br />

48 vaccinees (42 per cent) were already infected<br />

with some agent at the time of vaccination. In<br />

the present analysis, these 20 children are not<br />

considered, and only data on the 28 index children<br />

who were free of possibly interfering viruses<br />

will be given. Of the 28, 19 lacked antibody to<br />

all three types. None of the rest had antibody<br />

to Type 1, 6 were positive for Type 2, 2 for Type<br />

3, and one had both Types 2 and 3 antibody.<br />

The responses of these children to the first and<br />

second doses of vaccine in terms of virus excrefollowed<br />

closely. An exception was excretion of<br />

Type 2: we failed to detect Type 2 virus in three<br />

children who showed antibody conversions for<br />

this type.<br />

.In connection with these results, the family<br />

infection patterns were reviewed carefully. As<br />

will be reported by Dr. Paul, the spread of Type<br />

1 and Type 3 viruses was considerable, but in<br />

no instance was there evidence that the index<br />

child acquired infection from a contact. In no<br />

family did contacts excrete a virus type which<br />

did not infect the index child. Among the total<br />

48 families, there were five in which the index<br />

child was not infected after ingesting the first<br />

dose of vaccine, and in three of these, the second<br />

dose also failed to establish any poliovirus in the<br />

vaccinee. In none of these families was poliovirus<br />

isolated at any time from any of the contacts.<br />

We feel reasonably certain, therefore,<br />

that the results given for the vaccinees, represent<br />

the immunizing effect of the trivalent vac-<br />

TABLE 3. ANTIBODY CONVERSIONS AND V<strong>IRUS</strong> EXCRETION IN HOMOTYPIC NEGATIVE CHILDREN FREE<br />

OF ENTEROV<strong>IRUS</strong> INFECTION WHEN VACCINATED<br />

FIRST DOSE SECOND DOSE<br />

TYPE NUMBER PERCENT C PERCENT C<br />

ANTIBODY V<strong>IRUS</strong> ANTIBODY V<strong>IRUS</strong><br />

CONVERSION EXCRETION CONVERSION EXCRETION<br />

I 28 42 62 75 71<br />

TI 21 10 10 35 19<br />

Ir 25 83 84 88 88<br />

tion and antibody rises are given in Table 3.<br />

Antibody conversions one month after the first<br />

dose were observed in 42 per cent for Type 1,<br />

10 per cent for Type 2, and 83 per cent for<br />

Type 3. Virus excretion of Types 1 and 3 was<br />

present in a somewhat higher per cent; subsequent<br />

tests indicated that antibodies had developed<br />

in most of these children by the third bleeding.<br />

By the time one month had elapsed after<br />

the second dose, the conversion rates were 75 per<br />

cent, 37 per cent, and 91 per cent, respectively,<br />

for the three types; the per cent excreting viruses<br />

cine ingested by them, and not infection derived<br />

from some other source.<br />

Responses of children with pre-vaccinal antibody.<br />

Because of the small numbers, all index<br />

children with pre-vaccinal antibodies to any type<br />

are included in this analysis. There were 11<br />

who possessed Type 2 antibody prior to vaccination;<br />

none of these were later demonstrated to<br />

excrete Type 2 virus, but all became infected<br />

with Type 1 and/or Type 3. The Type 2 antibody<br />

responses were, nevertheless, striking: as<br />

indicated in Table 4, 8 of the 11 showed four-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!