28.12.2013 Views

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Course of Mass Immunization in USSR with Vaccine from Sabin's Strains<br />

421<br />

In the course of observations on vaccine virus<br />

excretion during revaccination it was possible<br />

to establish that in contrast to the killed Salk<br />

vaccine, the live poliovirus vaccine produced not<br />

only serological, but to a certain extent, also<br />

local immunity, i.e., immunological resistance of<br />

cells of the alimentary tract. This may result in<br />

progressive reduction of poliovirus circulation<br />

among the population.<br />

The problems associated with the dynamics of<br />

the development of local immunological resistance<br />

to poliovirus demand, however, further<br />

study and more precise definition. It is necessary<br />

also to solve the problem of providing continuous<br />

immunization considering possible complete<br />

disappearance of latent poliovirus strains.<br />

We believe that for this purpose children of 0<br />

to 3 years of age should be immunized with live<br />

vaccine annually.<br />

3. Virus carriage and contact transmission.<br />

As evidenced by numerous observations, including<br />

those performed at our Institute, oral immunization<br />

with live poliovaccine is accompanied by<br />

more or less protracted excretion of vaccine<br />

strains. The duration of virus excretion in<br />

children without antibodies is approximately<br />

twice as long as in those possessing them. In the<br />

environment of the vaccinees (under conditions of<br />

family contact) all persons susceptible to poliomyelitis<br />

pick up vaccine within a very short<br />

time and become immunized latently. No untoward<br />

reactions could be noted in connection with<br />

virus carriage and transmission of vaccine viruses<br />

by contact. Quite the contrary, it can be regarded<br />

as established that virus carriage and<br />

contact transmission during mass vaccination<br />

represent an exceptionally favorable factor conducive<br />

to all-round and more rapid immunization<br />

within families and communities.<br />

4. Interference. In oral immunization with<br />

live poliovirus vaccine the phenomenon of interference<br />

between wild and vaccine poliovirus<br />

strains, between non-poliomyelitis enteroviruses<br />

(ECHO and Coxsackie groups) and live vaccine<br />

strains, and also interference between individual<br />

types in live vaccine acquire special importance.<br />

As a result of extensive investigations it has<br />

been found that interference between vaccine<br />

and other enteroviruses occurs under various<br />

epidemiological conditions, with frequency in<br />

different months of the year. Winter months are,<br />

apparently, most advantageous for vaccination.<br />

The data obtained enable us to draw a preliminary<br />

conclusion to the effect that most instances<br />

of oral immunization failures are due to<br />

the influence of interference upon the vaccination<br />

process. The interference may, probably,<br />

be overcome by particularly massive vaccinations<br />

(with involvement of no less than 50 per cent of<br />

the susceptible population) and by repeated vaccinations<br />

over a period of one to three years.<br />

Furthermore, complete study of patterns<br />

governing the interference between enteroviruses<br />

and vaccine strains of poliovirus is urgent.<br />

5. Epidemiological effectiveness of mass immunization<br />

with live poliovirus vaccine. This<br />

was established for the first time in the Soviet<br />

Union on the basis of information gathered in<br />

1959, the latter discussed in detail in our Report<br />

No. 2 (Moscow, 1960). Particularly convincing<br />

was the reduction in poliomyelitis incidence in<br />

Estonia and Lithuania, where triple immunization<br />

with live vaccine was carried out before the<br />

summer poliomyelitis season, as well as in<br />

Karaganda and in the Moscow region where conditions<br />

favored comparisons between the incidence<br />

in the vaccinated and the unvaccinated<br />

groups. In the first three months of 1960, a<br />

satisfactory situation with regard to poliomyelitis<br />

continued to prevail in Estonia, Lithuania, and<br />

other areas which were subject to observations<br />

(see Tables 5 and 6).<br />

In Estonia during the last 12 months there<br />

were only 12 poliomyelitis cases. These were<br />

recorded only during the first six months, and the<br />

last six months were completely free from poliomyelitis.<br />

An unusually low number of poliomyelitis<br />

cases is recorded after vaccination in<br />

Lithuania. In Moscow, where every fourth<br />

inhabitant has been vaccinated (or over 90 per<br />

cent of the population under 20 years of age)<br />

a sharp reduction in poliomyelitis incidence is<br />

being observed. In all areas where vaccinations<br />

with live vaccine have been completed, the number<br />

of poliomyelitis cases is rapidly decreasing.<br />

Observations in carefully controlled trials indicated<br />

very high epidemiologic effectiveness of<br />

mass immunizations with live poliovirus vaccine<br />

(9.5-20.5-fold reduction in paralytic poliomyelitis<br />

incidence).<br />

Of particular interest are materials covering the<br />

1959 vaccination program in Tashkent. Simul-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!