28.12.2013 Views

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

116<br />

Safety-Field Evidence of Safety<br />

fold or greater rises. In the absence of Type 2<br />

excretion, these are interpreted as heterotypic<br />

Type 2 responses to infection with Types 1 or 3<br />

virus. The three who failed to show such heterotypic<br />

rises all had high Type 2 titers (5512) to<br />

start with; in two instances these may well have<br />

already represented heterotypic responses since<br />

the children were currently infected with Type 3<br />

virus, prior to vaccine ingestion. Similar heterotypic<br />

rises were observed in index children with<br />

pre-vaccinal Type 3 antibodies who became infected<br />

with other types.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

The results presented indicate that in the vaccine<br />

used, the infectiousness of the three types of<br />

virus was quite different, and the use of a relatively<br />

large dose (106TCD,,) did not completely<br />

overcome interference between the three types.<br />

The Type 3 component behaved as the dominant<br />

one, and produced a considerably higher number<br />

of infections than did Type 1, while Type 2,<br />

under these circumstances, was greatly suppressed.<br />

The impact of the second dose of vaccine,<br />

one month after the first, was not great.<br />

Probably if the interval between the two doses<br />

had been longer, the second might have been<br />

more effective.<br />

In interpreting the results of this study, considerable<br />

stress has been laid on controlling for<br />

such factors as contact spread and heterotypic<br />

antibody responses, which may be misleading<br />

and may give false impressions of the actual<br />

effectiveness of the trivalent vaccine per se. If<br />

these qualifications are taken into consideration<br />

in comparing our results with those of others<br />

using the same trivalent vaccine, the differences<br />

are actually not great.' 2, However, in<br />

older children 1 and adults ' , 6 higher conversion<br />

rates for Type 1, and particularly for<br />

Type 2 have been reported. A factor which<br />

might well be involved here is the immune status<br />

TABLE 4. HETEROTYPIC TYPE 2 ANTIBODY RESPONSES TO INFECTION WITH <strong>POLIO</strong>V<strong>IRUS</strong>ES TYPES 1<br />

AND 3<br />

NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODIES<br />

NUMBER OF<br />

<strong>POLIO</strong>V<strong>IRUS</strong><br />

CHILD SERUM 1 2 3 EXCRETION<br />

11-1 pre

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!