28.12.2013 Views

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

182<br />

Safety-Field Evidence of Safety<br />

0<br />

Cr<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

a-<br />

o<br />

oJ<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

,st VAC.<br />

__· ·___· ·__ _R L-,',<br />

TYPE N 2 VAC.<br />

1<br />

27 INDEX<br />

CHILDREN<br />

1 ," kN-<br />

32 SIBLINGS<br />

c<br />

LI<br />

v><br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

o10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

23 27 31 4 8 12<br />

JULY<br />

16 20<br />

AUGUST<br />

24 28 1 5 9 13 17SEPT<br />

SEPT<br />

FrI. 12. A comparison between the days on which 27 index children excreted Type 3 poliovirus with<br />

the days on which 32 siblings excreted this same virus. The siblings' infections are fairly coincidental<br />

to those of the index children.<br />

(see Fig. 5), spread the most, infecting 55 per<br />

cent of the homotypic negative siblings and reinfecting<br />

about 44 per cent of those who already<br />

had homotypic antibodies (Fig. 8). With Type<br />

1 (see Fig. 7), the response was less with a<br />

spread of 21 and 33 per cent, respectively. With<br />

Type 2, with a low infectivity rate, practically no<br />

spread was noted.<br />

It is to be emphasized again that none of these<br />

siblings were more than five years old, and for<br />

these results to be meaningful, the young age of<br />

the potential hosts in this population should be<br />

kept in mind, as well as the contemporary existing<br />

pattern of interfering non-poliovirus enteroviruses<br />

which found its highest prevalence among<br />

the 12-24-month-old children.<br />

As to the speed with which these attenuated<br />

poliovirus infections spread from the index child<br />

to siblings, these data appear in Figs. 11 and 12.<br />

In some of the families the index child only<br />

excreted the virus for a day or two, and the same<br />

was true with the siblings. In others, virus excretion<br />

continued for two to three weeks (see<br />

Fig. 11 for an example of what happened in a<br />

single family). Data in Fig. 12 record all the days<br />

in which index children excreted virus and all<br />

the days in which their siblings also excreted a<br />

poliovirus of similar type. This is a demonstration<br />

that there was no dearth of polioviruses going<br />

around in these families during the vaccination<br />

period. Figure 13 records the first recognized<br />

day of onset of the index child infection.<br />

It would seem from this last figure that a fair<br />

percentage of the siblings picked up their attenuated<br />

poliovirus from the index child almost at<br />

once with Type 3-indeed 63 per cent of them<br />

picked up the virus within five days from the<br />

known onset of exposure. With Type 1 this almost<br />

simultaneous onset was less, 37 per cent.<br />

The phenomenon of rapid spread which occurs<br />

in a fair percentage of families, can give the false<br />

impression that these infections were derived<br />

from a common extra-familial source, and not as<br />

a result of one human passage within the family.<br />

The observation recalls to the senior author many<br />

previous discussions in pre-vaccinal days, in<br />

which the attempt was made to interpret the<br />

spread of wild polioviruses through families.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!