28.12.2013 Views

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Virological Findings, Antibody Response of Infants Fed Multiple, Oral Vaccine 275<br />

additional infants from whose pre-feeding stool<br />

specimens an enterovirus was isolated but was<br />

not identifiable with the immune sera on hand.<br />

Here the picture is somewhat different; only<br />

child No. 30 showed consecutive isolations of<br />

Types 1 and 3 poliovirus with a corresponding<br />

serological response. Two infants, Nos. 19 and<br />

126 responded to a single type only. Four children<br />

did not excrete any of the vaccine viruses<br />

nor did they show any antibody response in their<br />

post-feeding sera. An unidentified virus isolated<br />

in the pre-feeding specimen from infant No.<br />

71 was again isolated from two post-feeding stool<br />

specimens.<br />

COMMENT<br />

Several points emerge from these findings. It<br />

has been shown that infants three to four months<br />

old, readily excrete the poliovirus strains fed for<br />

a period of at least four weeks. Only 6 per cent<br />

of the infants fed did not excrete any of the poliovirus<br />

types fed. These findings compare favorably<br />

with results obtained in older children. 8 1<br />

-<br />

Results of the virological findings, together with<br />

the corresponding homologous serological responses,<br />

indicate by the percentage of positives,<br />

as well as the high antibody titers, that infants<br />

three to four months of age may be effectively<br />

immunized with a multiple type oral poliomyelitis<br />

vaccine. It is regretted that no adequate<br />

information has been obtained with regard to the<br />

Type 2 poliovirus. Although the Lederle Type<br />

2 strain has been previously reported to be poorly<br />

excreted," 12 the almost total absence of this<br />

strain in the post-feeding stool specimens of infants<br />

fed the oral vaccine and the corresponding<br />

negative antibody response may be assumed to be<br />

due to the low concentration of this poliovirus<br />

type in the trivalent vaccine used for feeding.<br />

A very high correlation between poliovirus<br />

types isolated and the corresponding antibody<br />

response has been demonstrated, indicating that<br />

the techniques used for virus isolations and<br />

identifications were satisfactory. In approximately<br />

70 per cent of the infants studied, two<br />

types of the vaccine polioviruses multiplied adequately<br />

as judged by virus isolations and the<br />

immunological response. In a small per cent<br />

only a single type multiplied; this may be due to<br />

either interference between the poliovirus types `<br />

or to factors associated with individual responses.<br />

Presence or absence of maternal antibodies did<br />

not seem to affect virus excretion or homotypic<br />

antibody response although there were too few<br />

children with high antibody levels to draw definite<br />

conclusions. The studies on the children excreting<br />

enteroviruses other than polioviruses<br />

demonstrate that the problem of interference is<br />

not as serious as previously reported. Of the 14<br />

infants observed, 10 showed multiplication of at<br />

least one, and mostly of both poliovirus types fed,<br />

sometimes in combination with the pre-feeding<br />

enteroviruses. Lack of interference in the<br />

majority of the infants may be the result of the<br />

high dose of the multiple type oral vaccine administered,<br />

as previously suggested by Cox<br />

et al.l 2<br />

and by Sabin.`T<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Yekutiel, P., Levinger, E. L., Muhsam, H. V..<br />

and Yekutiel, M. P.: Poliomyelitis outbreak<br />

in Israel, 1950-1951. Bull. World Health<br />

Org. 12: 651-676, 1955.<br />

2. Davies, M. A., Marberg, K., Goldblum, N.,<br />

Levine, S., and Yekutiel, P.: Epidemiology of<br />

poliomyelitis in Israel, 1952-1959 with evaluation<br />

of Salk vaccination during a three-year<br />

period. Bull. World Health Org. In press.<br />

3. Spigland, I. and Goldblum, N.: Immunization<br />

of infants with formalinized poliomyelitis<br />

vaccine. Pediatrics. In press.<br />

4. Koprowski, H., Norton, T. W., Hummeler, K.,<br />

Stokes, Jr., J., Hunt, A. D., Flack, A., and<br />

Jervis, G. A.: Immunization of infants with<br />

living attenuated poliomyelitis virus. J. Am.<br />

M. Assn. 162: 1281-1288, 1956.<br />

5. Martins da Silva, M., McKelvey, J. L., Prem,<br />

K. A., Bauer, H., Cooney, M. K., and Johnson,<br />

E. A.: Studies of orally administered<br />

attenuated live virus poliomyelitis vaccine<br />

in newborns and infants under six months.<br />

Univ. Minn. M. Bull. 29: 133-150, 1957.<br />

6. Plotkin, S. A., Koprowski, H., and Stokes, J.:<br />

Clinical trials in infants of orally administered<br />

attenuated poliomyelitis viruses.<br />

Pediatrics 23: 1041-1062, 1959.<br />

7. Prem, K. A., McKelvey, J. L., and Fergus, J.:<br />

Immunologic response of infants under six<br />

months of age to oral trivalent poliomyelitis<br />

vaccine. In: Live Poliovirus Vaccines, First<br />

International Conference. Scient. Pub. no.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!