28.12.2013 Views

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

case of poliomyelitis, if it was poliomyelitis;<br />

again there were no residual symptoms.<br />

Finally, poliomyelitis occurred on the sixth<br />

day after the second inoculation with live trivalent<br />

vaccine in the third case from whom a T-<br />

Type 1 poliovirus strain was isolated. The child<br />

already had a titer of 1:512 to poliovirus Type<br />

2, and also a titer of 1:512 to a poliovirus Type 3.<br />

As for Type 1, there were no antibodies in the<br />

serum extracted on the third day after the onset<br />

of illness nor on the 33rd day of the illness.<br />

It is very difficult to interpret these results.<br />

Is it possible to say that these cases were caused<br />

by the vaccine virus? I think that none of us<br />

would dare to draw such a conclusion. Taking<br />

into account all the favorable conditions that<br />

generally existed during such a mass immunization<br />

campaign, it is impossible to say whether<br />

they were usual cases of poliomyelitis or that<br />

they were mild cases of the disease because of<br />

the inoculation background.<br />

Referring to the clinical picture among the<br />

vaccinees, we had only one case with residual<br />

symptoms among the vaccinated children. All<br />

other patients, who had been recorded as paralytic<br />

poliomyelitis cases, left the hospital without<br />

any residual symptoms. I believe that if the<br />

vaccination were to have a favorable result, all<br />

children, even those recorded as suffering from<br />

paralytic poliomyelitis, would leave the hospital<br />

without residual symptoms. This would be a<br />

great achievement.<br />

At any rate, the statistics available at present<br />

on paralytic poliomyelitis among the vaccinated<br />

Discussion 465<br />

Discuss ion 465<br />

in 1959 include only one case with residual<br />

symptoms.<br />

DR. ZHDANOV: The question is whether it is<br />

acceptable to prevent many illnesses by means of<br />

small amount of illnesses provoked by the vaccine.<br />

I believe such a philosophy to be a very<br />

bad one, not acceptable in any country.<br />

That is why we started this work on poliomyelitis,<br />

and we carefully searched, step by step, for<br />

all possible complications, in all experiments.<br />

We investigated every possibility.<br />

That is why our first field trial was undertaken<br />

not in the summer, when it was very difficult to<br />

understand what happens, but in the winter<br />

season in those regions where poliomyelitis was<br />

absent, or at least not so largely spread. Then,<br />

only after these small experiments with a few<br />

thousand who were vaccinated, did we go forward<br />

to other major regions, Esthonia and so on,<br />

where this disease was prevalent.<br />

And do not forget, the first immunization was<br />

carried out during the winter season in places<br />

where all the cases could be searched and investigated.<br />

Of course, when we started with the<br />

last campaign, we were quite sure that complications<br />

would be avoided in every possible way.<br />

CHAIRMAN RHODES: The next paper to be presented<br />

is by Dr. Plotkin on "Vaccination with<br />

the CHAT strain of Type 1 Attenuated Poliomyelitis<br />

Virus in Leopoldville, Belgian Congo."<br />

Following that, we shall have Dr. Gear's presentation<br />

on "Live Virus Vaccine Studies in<br />

Southern Africa."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!