28.12.2013 Views

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

476<br />

Efficacy-Field Evidence<br />

TABLE 2.<br />

REPORTED CASES OF <strong>POLIO</strong>MYELITIS-MAURITIUS<br />

YEAR<br />

No. OF CASES<br />

PERIOD<br />

CASE RATE<br />

PER 100,000<br />

MORTALITY<br />

RATE<br />

1945<br />

1948/49<br />

1952<br />

1959<br />

1018<br />

552<br />

284<br />

97<br />

Feb-April<br />

Nov-Feb<br />

March-June<br />

June-Sept<br />

240<br />

128<br />

56<br />

15<br />

6<br />

5.2<br />

1.0<br />

o<br />

The epidemic started while the vaccination<br />

campaign was still on, and occurred in midwinter.<br />

Three previous epidemics had occurred in summer<br />

or autumn. This is the first one in midwinter.<br />

The details are given in Table 2.<br />

The attack rate in children of one to seven<br />

years who had received two to three doses of Salk<br />

vaccine, and amongst the unvaccinated was:<br />

Vaccinated, 3 doses<br />

Vaccinated, 2 doses<br />

Unvaccinated<br />

Attack rate/100,000<br />

2.30<br />

11.23<br />

279.17<br />

It is of some interest to note that the incidence<br />

in those who had received three doses of Salk<br />

vaccine, which was prepared in North America,<br />

not in South Africa, was 2.3 per 100,000, two<br />

doses 11.23, and unvaccinated 279.<br />

These figures are slightly loaded in favor of the<br />

vaccine because of the specific attack rate which<br />

is not gone into here, but they do reflect a marked<br />

degree of protection.<br />

The attack rate in the various age groups is<br />

shown in Table 3. It will be noted that in the<br />

1959 epidemic, as in the previous ones, but even<br />

more marked, most cases occurred in the under<br />

three-year-old age group.<br />

Vaccination. Dr. Winter arrived on 14 August<br />

1959. After consultation with the Ministry of<br />

Health, it was agreed that all children between<br />

six months and 10 years should receive the vaccine.<br />

Vaccination centers, each in charge of a<br />

medical officer, were established and vaccination<br />

was started on 24 August. There was a good response<br />

and within 10 days, 195,000 children out<br />

of an estimated population of 213,000 had been<br />

given the vaccine. The course of the epidemic<br />

is shown in Table 4. It will be noted that<br />

after 29 August there were only three further<br />

cases, and there have been no cases since then.<br />

It is apparent that the epidemic was waning<br />

before the feeding of the vaccine virus was begun.<br />

However, none of the three previous epidemics<br />

terminated so abruptly and it is possible that the<br />

vaccination campaign played some part in bringing<br />

it to an end.<br />

The island was devastated by two cyclones in<br />

February and March this year, but no outbreaks<br />

of poliomyelitis followed in their wake, as was<br />

the case in 1945. Professor Dick went to the<br />

island to study the very severe epidemic which<br />

occurred in that year. To protect against typhoid<br />

fever resulting from the breakdown in sanitation<br />

about 250,000 people were inoculated twice. The<br />

Director of Medical Services has commented that<br />

the contrast of the administration of this vaccine<br />

impressed him with the ease of the giving of<br />

poliovirus vaccine by mouth.<br />

TABLE 3.<br />

<strong>POLIO</strong>MYELITIS ATTACK RATES (PER 100,000)-MAURITIUS<br />

YEAR<br />

1945<br />

1952<br />

1959<br />

ATTACK RATE/100,000, BY AGE GROUP<br />

0-1 1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10-+<br />

400 1490 1230 1230 1300 1190 860 340 170 80 Not given<br />

237 388 422 139 36 Not given<br />

55 154 115 41 14 15 10 5 11 0 .94<br />

__

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!