28.12.2013 Views

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Vaccination and Challenge-Poliomyelitis in Nicaragua 557<br />

tory was confirmed. It may be noted in the<br />

table that eight of these patients were vaccinated<br />

during the mass vaccination program in Managua<br />

in 1958, and they received all three types<br />

of poliovirus as monovalent vaccines. The other<br />

seven patients had received liquid trivalent vaccine.<br />

These two groups will be considered separately.<br />

Cases among monovalent-vaccine-fed children.<br />

Cases Nos. 3 and 4, from whom fecal material<br />

was not collected, recovered completely within<br />

four months after the onset of paralysis. This<br />

could suggest that the transient paralysis observed<br />

was not due to poliovirus infection.<br />

From the stool sample of case No. 7, a nonpoliovirus<br />

agent was recovered in monkeykidney<br />

tissue culture (MKTC). The sample was<br />

collected 54 days after onset.<br />

In case No. 8, from whom a stool specimen<br />

was collected five days after onset, no agent<br />

was recovered by any of the laboratories. This<br />

fact may suggest an etiology unrelated to poliovirus.<br />

Unfortunately, stool specimens were not<br />

available from cases Nos. 1, 2, and 6. Serologic<br />

results on two of these cases do not make it<br />

possible to rule out poliovirus infection, and<br />

these cases, therefore, could be considered as<br />

vaccine failures.<br />

Cases among trivalent-vaccine-fed children.<br />

The onset of paralysis in cases Nos. 11 and 12<br />

occurred within 48 hours after vaccine administration.<br />

The onset of paralysis in cases Nos. 10<br />

and 13, occurred 49 and 44 days, respectively,<br />

after vaccine administration, and thus represent<br />

onsets well beyond the accepted incubation perriod.(3)<br />

They will be regarded as instances of<br />

vaccine failure if the stool and blood studies<br />

which are in progress confirm the clinical diagnosis<br />

of poliomyelitis.<br />

Cases Nos. 5 and 9 had onsets nine to 13 days<br />

after feeding, and in spite of the fact that they<br />

occurred within the period of the outbreak under<br />

consideration, they deserve comment since both<br />

might be suspected of vaccine strain etiology.<br />

Case No. 5. Although this 32-month-old child<br />

had had four injections of Salk vaccine, the last<br />

one being eight months previously, she was fed<br />

the trivalent vaccine on 11 December 1959. Her<br />

illness had onset 13 days later and after four<br />

days with a temperature of 38.5 ° C. she developed<br />

paralysis in both legs and then quadriplegia<br />

at which time she was hospitalized. One<br />

week later she was sufficiently improved to be<br />

taken home. Shortly thereafter her parents took<br />

her to Mexico City for rehabilitation treatment.<br />

After two and a half months she returned almost<br />

fully recovered. She was seen in mid-May at<br />

which time there was still some weakness in<br />

the right deltoid and right leg, but without any<br />

suggestion of muscular atrophy in either legs<br />

or arms. The prognosis of the pediatrician who<br />

treated her in Mexico City was for complete<br />

recovery in 30 to 60 days. A stool specimen<br />

from this patient, obtained 27 days after vaccination<br />

and 15 days after onset, yielded Type 3<br />

poliovirus. Neutralizing antibodies to all three<br />

types of poliovirus were demonstrated in a<br />

serum specimen which was collected on the same<br />

date as the stool specimen. Available laboratory<br />

data do not rule out poliovirus infection, but<br />

the clinical evolution of this patient's disease<br />

is rather suggestive of a non-poliovirus etiology.<br />

Case No. 9. Poliovirus Type 1 has been isolated<br />

from a stool specimen taken 11 days after<br />

vaccination and two days after onset. Laboratory<br />

studies are not yet complete and the case is<br />

still under observation. The interval between<br />

vaccine administration and onset, as well as the<br />

fact that the virus isolated corresponds in type<br />

to the one responsible for the epidemic, requires<br />

that both natural infection and vaccine implication<br />

be carefully studied. Investigations designed<br />

to provide additional data for consideration<br />

are still in progress.<br />

In Table 7a the data are summarized for 12<br />

paralytic cases for which the records for the<br />

dates and types of vaccine administered are<br />

incomplete or missing, or the patients failed to<br />

receive all three types of virus. Cases Nos. 16,<br />

17, and 18 received only vaccines for Types 2<br />

and 3 during the mass vaccination program in<br />

1958. Stools from cases Nos. 16 and 18 were<br />

collected 25 and nine days, respectively, after<br />

onset, and, when examined in MKTC one<br />

yielded a non-poliovirus and the other no virus.<br />

Type 1 poliovirus was isolated from case No. 17.<br />

Because none of these three patients had received<br />

Type 1 vaccine they may be dismissed<br />

from further consideration.<br />

Cases Nos. 21, 23, 25, and 27 were apparently<br />

vaccinated as infants and are assumed to have<br />

received one dose of monovalent vaccine, presumably<br />

Type 2, since trivalent vaccine did not<br />

come into use in Managua until sometime in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!