28.12.2013 Views

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

LIVE POLIO IRUS VACCINES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Vaccination with CHAT Strain Type 1 Polio Virus in Leopoldville 471<br />

TABLE 10.<br />

V<strong>IRUS</strong>ES (LEOPOLDVILLE)<br />

LoG TCID 50 AT 37°C % CONTROL PLAQUE<br />

V<strong>IRUS</strong> GROUP -LOG TCID AT 40 0 C DIAMETER UNDER<br />

CHAT ANTISERUM<br />

CHAT Vaccine > 6.0 0<br />

Mahoney Virulent 0.0 40<br />

Control<br />

211 Vaccinated > 2.7 10<br />

Children<br />

212 > 4.5 0<br />

233 Non-Vacc. 0.5 50<br />

Paralytic<br />

235 Cases 0.2 45<br />

224 0.8 40<br />

229 0.0 50<br />

220 Vaccinated 0.3 38<br />

Paralytic<br />

Case<br />

525 Non-Vacc. 0.0 43<br />

Case in<br />

Vaccinated<br />

Community<br />

several cases of Type 1 paralytic poliomyelitis.<br />

Consequently, on 30 November 1959 CHAT was<br />

administered to most of the European and African<br />

population of the village. Thus 374 Europeans<br />

of all ages and 253 African children less<br />

than five years old were given the virus. It is not<br />

known how many remained unvaccinated in the<br />

village, but there is no question that there were<br />

many Africans who failed to appear for vaccination.<br />

On 10 December 1959, 20 days after the<br />

vaccination had been performed, the woman arrived<br />

in the Congo from Holland. On 10 January<br />

1960, one month after her arrival in this<br />

village, she developed bulbar spinal poliomyelitis<br />

and Type 1 poliovirus was isolated from her<br />

stool. This is the virus shown in the table to<br />

be capable of breaking through the CHAT antiserum.<br />

Since this woman has two young children,<br />

it is conceivable that she was infected by<br />

a wild Type 1 poliovirus transmitted from African<br />

children to her own.<br />

Efficacy of vaccination. In the first report of<br />

the vaccination campaign in Leopoldville, an<br />

attempt was made to calculate the efficacy of<br />

vaccination despite numerous problems in the<br />

evaluation of the results. It was determined,<br />

using two methods, that there was at least mathematical<br />

evidence of approximately 60 per cent<br />

protection afforded by the vaccine. It was also<br />

shown that the antibody response to vaccination,<br />

presumably because of viral interference, was<br />

only 60 per cent. Another year's data have been<br />

incorporated into calculations which are presented<br />

on the next two tables. Table 11 shows<br />

calculation of efficacy by the person-week method<br />

in which we have taken two periods of time, first<br />

the Type 1 epidemic (October 1958 through<br />

March 1959) and second, the recent experience<br />

(May 1959 through April 1960). For each period,<br />

those that are vaccinated at the beginning<br />

are multiplied by the number of weeks to the<br />

end of the period, and those that are vaccinated<br />

later are multiplied by the number of weeks remaining<br />

to the end of the period. Thus, cumulative<br />

experience of vaccinated and unvaccinated<br />

is built up. For the total experience, we find a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!