04.06.2014 Views

Download this publication - PULP

Download this publication - PULP

Download this publication - PULP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Taking diversity seriously: Religious associations and work-related discrimination 99<br />

to co-religionists exclusively. 113 So Heintz is not inconsistent with the rule<br />

established in Caldwell, Garrod and Kearley that a religious school may<br />

reasonably require its teachers to abide by a lifestyle requirement that<br />

discriminates on otherwise prohibited grounds and by dismissing teachers<br />

who fail to do so.<br />

5.3 The United Kingdom<br />

In the UK, the Human Rights Act, 1998 incorporates a right to religious<br />

liberty and a right to be free from discrimination (articles 9 and 14<br />

respectively of the European Convention on Human Rights (European<br />

Convention)). Exemptions to legislation that outlaws discrimination on<br />

the grounds of sex, religion and sexual orientation permit religious<br />

employers to discriminate on these grounds in certain instances.<br />

Discrimination in employment on the grounds of religion is prohibited<br />

by the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations, 2003, 114<br />

which includes an exemption for employers who have ‘an ethos based on<br />

religion or belief’. Regulation 7(3) provides that such employers can<br />

discriminate on the grounds of religion where being of a particular religion<br />

or belief is ‘a genuine occupational requirement for the job’ and ‘it is<br />

proportionate to apply that requirement in the particular case’.<br />

Discrimination in employment on the grounds of sex is outlawed by<br />

the Sex Discrimination Act, 1975, as amended by the Employment<br />

Equality (Sex Discrimination) Regulations, 2005. 115 Section 19 of <strong>this</strong> Act,<br />

as amended, provides that sex discrimination in cases in which<br />

‘employment is for the purposes of an organised religion' is permissible,<br />

provided that the requirement that employees be of a particular gender is<br />

imposed on one of two bases: where the discriminatory requirement is<br />

imposed ‘so as to comply with the doctrines of the religion’, or where the<br />

requirement is imposed ‘because of the nature of the employment and the<br />

context in which it is carried out, so as to avoid conflicting with the<br />

strongly held religious convictions of a significant number of the religion's<br />

followers’.<br />

The Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation) Regulations, 2003 116<br />

prohibit discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation, but include<br />

an exemption (Regulation 7(3)) resembling the exemption for<br />

discrimination on the grounds of sex: ‘If the employment is for the<br />

purposes of an organised religion’ a requirement related to sexual<br />

orientation may be imposed either if it is needed ‘to comply with the<br />

113 Heintz (n 112 above) paras 109, 144 & 191.<br />

114 SI 2003/1660.<br />

115<br />

SI 2005/2467.<br />

116 SI 2003/1661.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!