04.06.2014 Views

Download this publication - PULP

Download this publication - PULP

Download this publication - PULP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11<br />

Iain<br />

CHAPTER<br />

BALANCING AND THE<br />

LIMITATION OF RIGHTS IN<br />

THE SOUTH AFRICAN<br />

CONSTITUTION<br />

Currie*<br />

1 What does it mean to have a constitutional right?<br />

The Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Bill 2 of 2009 was introduced into<br />

Parliament just prior to the 2009 election and was subsequently withdrawn<br />

without being considered by Parliament. 1 It was revived after the election and<br />

considered in detail by the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Police. 2 The<br />

Committee has since split the Bill into two parts. The first part deals with wideranging<br />

amendments to the law governing the obtaining of fingerprints, and it<br />

was adopted by the Committee in March 2010 and passed by the National<br />

Assembly in June. 3 Consideration of part 2 of the Bill will take place later in<br />

the 2010 parliamentary session.<br />

If it follows the form of the Bill originally introduced in 2009, 4 then part<br />

2 of the Forensic Procedures Bill will amend the South African Police<br />

Service Act 68 of 1995 and permit the establishment of a national DNA<br />

database. This will consist of DNA profiles (popularly known as a ‘DNA<br />

fingerprint’) derived from DNA samples that have been collected from<br />

crime scenes, from arrested persons, from convicted offenders and from<br />

volunteers. In addition to DNA profiles, the database will also hold, ‘where<br />

applicable and scientifically possible’, the physical DNA samples for<br />

possible use if ‘significant technological advances’ have been made since the<br />

compilation of the DNA profile to which they relate.<br />

* University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.<br />

1 ‘Misdaad-wet met maande vertraag’ Rapport 21 March 2009; ‘MP defends slow<br />

progress of DNA testing Bill’ Cape Argus 25 March 2009.<br />

2 Information from the Parliamentary Monitoring Group database http://www.pmg.<br />

org.za (accessed 27 July 2010).<br />

3<br />

The most important change proposed by <strong>this</strong> part of the Bill is to allow the police to<br />

perform comparative searches of other, non-forensic, fingerprint databases such as the<br />

databases of the Departments of Home Affairs and of Transport. See clause 6 of the<br />

Bill.<br />

4 Some changes can be expected. The reasons for the Committee delaying consideration<br />

of the DNA-database aspect of the original Bill were concerns about the readiness of<br />

the police to implement it and concerns about the constitutionality of some of its<br />

proposed measures. See ‘DNA database delayed’ IT Web 5 July 2009.<br />

251

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!