04.06.2014 Views

Download this publication - PULP

Download this publication - PULP

Download this publication - PULP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

78 Chapter 3<br />

to permit it to engage in work-related discrimination on the basis of sexual<br />

orientation with respect to a music teacher. The issue confronting the<br />

Court was whether a religious association's right to discriminate on<br />

prohibited grounds should extend beyond religious leaders to include a<br />

music teacher in a faith school not involved in religious instruction.<br />

My purpose in <strong>this</strong> article is to determine the appropriate domain of<br />

anti-discrimination law in so far as government wishes to prevent workrelated<br />

discrimination by, and within, religious associations. Claims by<br />

religious associations that they should be permitted to engage in workrelated<br />

discrimination on otherwise illegal grounds give rise to a clash of<br />

rights: the rights to freedom of association and freedom of religion, on the<br />

one hand, and the right to equality on the other. 10 My aim is to ascertain,<br />

with reference to Strydom, the circumstances in which it is acceptable to<br />

privilege the rights to religious liberty and freedom of association over the<br />

right to equality: circumstances, that is, in which religious associations<br />

should be permitted to engage in work-related discrimination on otherwise<br />

prohibited grounds.<br />

2 Equality, freedom of association and religious<br />

liberty<br />

The principle of equality, a core liberal right, requires that people should<br />

be treated with equal concern and respect. 11 The inclusion of the right to<br />

equality in the Constitution obliges the state to ensure that the principle of<br />

equal treatment is not violated in central areas of people's lives such as<br />

work.<br />

Work is central to most people because it provides an income stream,<br />

enabling individuals to house, feed and clothe themselves and their<br />

dependants. Work also provides non-economic benefits, such as a<br />

heightened sense of well-being, improved self-esteem and a reduced level<br />

of depression. 12 The right to equality requires that all individuals have<br />

equal access to these benefits. Work opportunities should in general not<br />

depend on the characteristics of individuals, such as religion, race, gender<br />

10 The right to freedom of association is protected in sec 18 of the Constitution, which<br />

provides that ‘[e]veryone has the right to freedom of association’. The right to freedom<br />

of religion is recorded in sec 15(1) of the Constitution, which reads: ‘Everyone has the<br />

right to freedom of conscience, religion, thought, belief and opinion.’ Freedom of<br />

religion and associational liberty are conjoined in sec 31(1): ‘Persons belonging to a<br />

cultural, religious or linguistic community may not be denied the right, with other<br />

members of that community (a) to enjoy their culture, practise their religion and use<br />

their language; and (b) to form, join and maintain cultural, religious and linguistic<br />

associations and other organs of civil society.’<br />

11 For a discussion of the right to equality in the context of South African<br />

constitutionalism, see C Albertyn & B Goldblatt ‘Equality’ in Woolman et al (n 1<br />

above) ch 35.<br />

12 V Schulze ‘Life’s work’ (2000) 100 Columbia Law Review 1881.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!