04.06.2014 Views

Download this publication - PULP

Download this publication - PULP

Download this publication - PULP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

326 Chapter 14<br />

effective realisation of socio-economic rights depends upon policy choices and<br />

that it is precisely in choices of <strong>this</strong> nature where judges lack two essential<br />

qualifications: expertise and political accountability. 30 This argument<br />

however does not seem unassailable.<br />

Judges in common law jurisdictions have engaged in policy considerations<br />

for a very long time. Richardson has argued, for instance, that judges make<br />

law and are expected to make law and in doing so, they necessarily weigh<br />

policy considerations. 31<br />

Wade similarly contends that judges ‘are up to their necks in policy, as they<br />

have been all through history’. 32 Hunt argues that ‘judicial law making is not<br />

incidental or peripheral to policy matters’. He argues that, on the contrary,<br />

‘it has shaped concepts and principles with crucial policy content, such as the<br />

law of negligence and rules of natural justice’. 33 In Port Elizabeth Municipality<br />

v Various Occupiers (the Port Elizabeth Municipality Case), 34 Sachs J stated that:<br />

The integrity of the rights-based vision of the Constitution is punctured when<br />

governmental action augments rather than reduces denial of the claims of the<br />

desperately poor to the basic elements of a decent existence. Hence the need for<br />

special judicial control of a process that is both socially stressful and<br />

potentially conflictual. 35<br />

Sachs J suggests that, firstly, the socio-economic rights guaranteed by the<br />

Constitution provide the people with claims. This rights-based vision seeks to<br />

reduce or avert the denial of these claims.<br />

As I will later demonstrate, the Mazibuko decision represents a<br />

complete retreat from <strong>this</strong> position as the Court denies that the people have<br />

such claims under the Constitution. This leaves very little of the rights-based<br />

vision of the Constitution put forward by Sachs J. Secondly, the effective<br />

guarantee of socio-economic rights frequently involves the distribution<br />

and/or redistribution of resources, and in <strong>this</strong> case Sachs J requires ‘a<br />

process that is both socially stressful and conflictual’ which, according to<br />

her, is the very reason why the judiciary has to engage with these issues.<br />

This addresses the competence concern in the sense that the courts are<br />

seen as competent to deal with polycentric conflict-ridden issues that are<br />

socially stressful. However, in the unanimous Court decision in Mazibuko,<br />

which included Sachs J himself, retreated from <strong>this</strong> position and pushed<br />

the frontiers of its deference towards other state organs much further.<br />

30 E Mureinik, ‘Beyond a charter of luxuries: Economic rights in the Constitution’ (1992) 8<br />

SAJHR 464 467.<br />

31<br />

WS Richardson ‘Public interest litigation’ (1995) 3 Waikato LR 1.<br />

32 HWR Wade Constitutional fundamentals (1989) 78.<br />

33 See P Hunt Reclaiming social rights: International and comparative perspectives (1996) 66.<br />

34<br />

2005 1 SA 217 (CC).<br />

35 Port Elizabeth Municipality (n 35 above) para 18.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!