12.07.2015 Views

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>and</strong> socialisation practices, as well as to its relative isolation from other ministries<strong>and</strong> non-state actors. This aura <strong>of</strong> conservatism is underlined by a perceived respectfor tradition, <strong>and</strong> an esprit de corps engendered by the diplomatic lifestyle <strong>and</strong> its steeprequirements for entry.Fontaine described Itamaraty as follows:It is nationalist, but more pragmatic than romantic. It is oriented toward Europe<strong>and</strong> not America. It emphasizes preservation <strong>of</strong> good relations with old friends, butnot at the expense <strong>of</strong> making new ones. It entails a desire for a larger Brazilian roleon the world scene, but it does not exaggerate the nation’s present prospects forworld power. 290Itamaraty has indeed been a force for continuity in Brazilian foreign policy. Inrecent years, however, its autonomy <strong>and</strong> dominance over the foreign policy process– though never beyond question – have come under increasing pressure. While theForeign Ministry’s influence has tended historically to wax <strong>and</strong> wane, depending onthe personalities holding power in government, <strong>and</strong> in the institution, respectively, ithas been noted that with the increasing dem<strong>and</strong>s on diplomacy brought byglobalisation, Itamaraty has found it challenging to keep up. Already in 1976, oncemilitary ‘decompression’, or a moderate form <strong>of</strong> liberalisation, had been set in trainby the government <strong>of</strong> Ernesto Geisel, ‘the foreign service [found] itself…becomingless important, not more important, at a time when foreign affairs [was] reallybeginning to matter for Brazil’. 291 This loss <strong>of</strong> importance was attributed to theincreasing mismatch between Brazil’s international economic goals, <strong>and</strong> itsinadequate diplomatic capacity in this area. 292 Itamaraty was not equipped to engagein the complex economic negotiations Brazil required to diversify its economicrelations at the end <strong>of</strong> the 1970s, when the phenomenal growth from earlier in thedecade was beginning to slow.This trend was strengthened in the early 1990s, under the leadership <strong>of</strong> Fern<strong>and</strong>oHenrique Cardoso, who presided over an increasing internationalisation <strong>of</strong> theBrazilian economy, <strong>and</strong> therewith the diversification <strong>of</strong> Itamaraty’s role ininternational trade issues. Cardoso oversaw the inclusion <strong>of</strong> “new voices” in290 Fontaine, cited in Schneider, Brazil, 67.291 Schneider, Brazil, 95.292 Ibid.130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!