12.07.2015 Views

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The concepts <strong>of</strong> ‘neutrality’, ‘non-alignment’, ‘Southern solidarity’ <strong>and</strong> ‘South-Southco-operation’ have all been used with reference to the international actions <strong>of</strong> thethird world as a collectivity. It is worthwhile to separate these concepts from theconcept <strong>of</strong> ‘internationalism’ as used in the thesis. To begin with, ‘neutrality’ wasnever a feature <strong>of</strong> the positions adopted by developing countries in collectiveforums such as the Asian-African Conference <strong>of</strong> 1955, or the Non-AlignedMovement. Non-alignment referred primarily to the right reserved by the newlyindependentstates not to declare their support in advance for either the East or Westblocs on international matters. 119 Non-aligned states remained vigorously chargedwith international questions, however, <strong>and</strong> did not simply seek to avoid affiliationwith the East or West. Neutrality, meanwhile, is the “legal status that arises from theabstention <strong>of</strong> a state from any participation in a war between other states”. 120‘Southern’ or ‘Third World’ solidarity is an amorphous concept related to thesupport (mainly political <strong>and</strong> economic) <strong>of</strong>fered to countries lacking in industrialdevelopment, with a shared colonial experience <strong>and</strong> a perspective <strong>of</strong> marginalisationin international affairs, by countries sharing these qualities. Finally, ‘South-Southcooperation’ took form from the end <strong>of</strong> the 1960s onward, <strong>and</strong> was inspired bydependencia perspectives advanced by South American scholars. It was evident in thedesire <strong>of</strong> developing countries, recognising a subservient role in relation to theadvanced industrialised economies, to de-link from these economies <strong>and</strong> forgestronger economic ties among themselves, which they assumed would be lessexploitative <strong>and</strong> more relevant to their development. South-South co-operation hastaken the form <strong>of</strong> capital flows <strong>and</strong> trade contacts, though these have never comeclose to matching the established contacts with traditional Northern economicpartners.Third World internationalism, not unlike the internationalism identified with largedeveloping states earlier, is a distinct foreign policy posture that assumes thedeveloping world as its focal point, <strong>and</strong> emphasises the issues <strong>of</strong> internationaleconomic justice <strong>and</strong> development; questions <strong>of</strong> equitable international political119 Karefa-Smart, “Africa <strong>and</strong> the United Nations”, 765120 P.A. Murthy <strong>and</strong> B.K. Shrivastava, Neutrality <strong>and</strong> non-alignment in the 1990s,(<strong>London</strong>: Sangam Books: 1991): xv..68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!