12.07.2015 Views

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

emphasised the principle <strong>of</strong> non-interference in the domestic affairs <strong>of</strong> other states;it emphasised peaceful resolution <strong>of</strong> international conflicts; as well as multilateralapproaches over regional or unilateral approaches to pertinent internationalquestions, such as trade. This reflected a domestic situation in which PT’s politicalposition was precariously poised. The party was in no position in Congress to utilisepolitical capital on international issues, <strong>and</strong> therefore was satisfied with stronginternationalist gestures. On one issue, it did make an allowance, namely thedeployment <strong>of</strong> troops as part <strong>of</strong> the UN Stabilisation Mission in Haiti. The timing<strong>of</strong> this deployment was crucial, given Brazil’s desire to be seen as a responsible <strong>and</strong>capable regional player. In Lula’s second term, with Brazil’s economic fortunesimproving markedly, <strong>and</strong> Lula’s own domestic <strong>and</strong> international popularity soaring,Brazil was able to translate a greater proportion <strong>of</strong> national power into state powerfor foreign policy purposes.National Power <strong>and</strong> State Power in Lula’s Second Term: 2007-2010Consolidating the Brazilian State <strong>and</strong> National Interests in the Second TermLula’s second term was marked by a greater assertiveness in foreign policy that<strong>of</strong>ten contradicted the principles <strong>of</strong> internationalism espoused by the PT. Therewas a greater sense <strong>of</strong> purpose in the country’s foreign engagements, a temperedmove away from internationalism, in spite <strong>of</strong> what appeared to be greater rhetorical– <strong>and</strong> even in some cases, material – commitment to it in principle. Thestrengthening <strong>and</strong> institutionalisation <strong>of</strong> the state, <strong>and</strong> PT’s control over it, meantthat accommodation <strong>of</strong> divergent social <strong>and</strong> political strata, while still a politicalnecessity, was less obvious in the domain <strong>of</strong> foreign policy, especially foreignsecurity policy. This could be seen in the form <strong>of</strong> greater assertiveness about Brazil’seconomic interests in its dealings with neighbouring countries; the strongerdeclaration <strong>of</strong> national autonomy in the updating <strong>of</strong> national security principles <strong>and</strong>military materiel; 590 <strong>and</strong>, the manner <strong>of</strong> Brazil’s engagement in Haiti (to be discussedin Chapter 7).590 The National Strategy <strong>of</strong> Defense: Peace <strong>and</strong> Security for Brazil was released in2008. Some <strong>of</strong> the highlights <strong>of</strong> this document are the proposed unification <strong>of</strong> Brazil’sArmed Forces under a joint comm<strong>and</strong>; the reservation <strong>of</strong> the right to the development <strong>of</strong>232

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!