12.07.2015 Views

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.4. Influence as a function <strong>of</strong> institutional freedom <strong>and</strong> legitimating powerAs noted by Almeida, in his analysis <strong>of</strong> the political <strong>and</strong> institutional role played byBrazilian political parties in the formulation <strong>of</strong> foreign policy, political parties –ruling or otherwise – have had minimal to marginal influence on the making <strong>of</strong>foreign policy in the Brazilian system. This is not a Brazilian curiosity, but aphenomenon that occurs across a wide spectrum <strong>of</strong> state types <strong>and</strong> politicalregimes. Ronald Schneider first noted <strong>of</strong> Brazil that, “Political parties are notsignificant factors in foreign policy-making”. 537 The main contact that politicalparties had with foreign policy issues occurred in the institutional context <strong>of</strong>Congress, where members <strong>of</strong> the legislature could veto any international accordsentered into, or actions conducted, by the state. 538As the ruling party, however, PT has had the opportunity to shape foreign policy ina more direct manner, an opportunity that it has seized. This has been the result <strong>of</strong>the fluid international environment that the party entered, as well as the changerepresented by Lula in the form <strong>of</strong> his personality <strong>and</strong> his political heritage. UnderLula, it was noted, for the first time in decades, if not ever, “foreign policy wasconceived <strong>and</strong> conducted under the overriding influence <strong>of</strong> non-pr<strong>of</strong>essionaldiplomats”, “with PT’s ‘foreign policy’ as the dominant element in Brazilian foreignpolicy since the beginning <strong>of</strong> the da Silva government…”. 539Other observers are at pains to point out, meanwhile, that national policy can neverbe held hostage to party dictates. This holds true on certain questions. The Brazilianstate has had to tread cautiously around Hugo Chavez, for example, while PT as apolitical party - prior to its migration to the political centre - once held ideals notdissimilar to Chavez’s. However, PT has continued its own br<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> diplomacy bystrengthening relations with Leftist governments in South America, in countriesincluding Venezuela, Cuba <strong>and</strong> Bolivia. The party has also worked to strengthenrelations with other parties <strong>and</strong> movements <strong>of</strong> the left in South America, through itsestablishment <strong>of</strong> the Foro do São Paolo in 1990. As claimed in PT’s most recent537 Schneider, Ronald, (1976: 137), cited in Almeida, 1993. A Política da PolíticaExterna: Os Partidos Politicos Nas Relacoes Internacionais do Brasil, 1930-1990. ASeminar at the Ministry <strong>of</strong> External Relations, Brasilia.538 Almeida, “A Política da Política Externa”, 57.539 Almeida. “Brazil <strong>and</strong> Non-intervention”, 162.215

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!