12.07.2015 Views

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A number <strong>of</strong> scholars are agreed that the ascent <strong>of</strong> Partido dos Trabalhadores to powerin 2003 after three prior attempts at winning the presidency, signalled a perceptiblechange in Brazil’s foreign policy. There is less agreement on the extent <strong>of</strong> thesechanges. For Soares de Lima <strong>and</strong> Hirst changes are embodied in “the inclusion <strong>of</strong>the social agenda as a major topic <strong>of</strong> foreign affairs”, along with Brazil’s greateremphasis on the reform <strong>of</strong> the major multilateral institutions <strong>and</strong> its unease with theunequal distribution <strong>of</strong> power <strong>and</strong> wealth in these institutions. 525 For Vidigal, thechanges are four-fold, both diplomatic <strong>and</strong> economic in nature, <strong>and</strong> characterisedby:• Greater emphasis on the internationalisation <strong>of</strong> Brazilian firms;• Diversification <strong>of</strong> the country’s international ties;• Stronger action in multilateral organisations; <strong>and</strong>,• Adoption <strong>of</strong> the non-indifference principle. 526For Almeida, the greatest changes occurred in discourse <strong>and</strong> in practice, rather thanin the broad lines <strong>of</strong> Brazilian foreign policy. 527 While juridical commitments toprinciples such as ‘non-interference’ <strong>and</strong> respect for state sovereignty remained, itwas in implementation that new divergences appeared. 528Even heading into Lula’s (relatively late) campaign for re-election in 2006, PT wassubdued on the international goals <strong>of</strong> the party, apportioning only a small section <strong>of</strong>the party manifesto to this topic. It limited these to Brazil’s accentuation <strong>of</strong> itssovereign presence in the world; the continued importance <strong>of</strong> multilateralismthrough reform <strong>of</strong> the UN <strong>and</strong> UNSC; <strong>and</strong>, the campaign for fairer economic,financial <strong>and</strong> commercial arrangements to benefit developing countries. Other goalsincluded the commitment to the fight against world hunger, <strong>and</strong> in favour <strong>of</strong> peace,as well as the perennial priority <strong>of</strong> South American integration. Relations withAfrican countries were singled out for special importance, while relations with525 Lima <strong>and</strong> Hirst, “Brazil as an intermediate state”, 22.526 Carlos Vidigal, “Brazil: a cordial power? Brazilian diplomacy in the early 21 st century”,in RECIIS, 4, No.1 (2010): 33-41, passim.527 Almeida, “A Política Internacional do PT” 88.528 See PR Almeida, “Brazil <strong>and</strong> Non-Intervention”, 3 March, 2010. Accessed online at:http://textospra.blogspot.com/2010/03/569-brazil-<strong>and</strong>-non-intervention-paulo-r.html on 7March, 2011.212

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!