12.07.2015 Views

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(449 A <strong>of</strong> 1950) on the illegality <strong>of</strong> South Africa’s continued presence there. 343While South Africa retained its UN membership until 1974, <strong>and</strong> thereby benefitedfrom the legitimacy afforded by multilateralism, it undermined the concept byfailing to implement the opinions <strong>of</strong> the international community regarding bothNamibia <strong>and</strong> its own domestic policies.The African National Congress came to power in South Africa following the firstall-race election in 1994. The relative calm surrounding the electoral process –which was, however, not without its own controversy <strong>and</strong> low-grade civil violence –marked the high point <strong>of</strong> a period <strong>of</strong> intense struggle between revolutionary <strong>and</strong>reactionary forces, underscored by race - in South African society that hadcontinued for much <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century. These forces have continued toanimate South African politics well into the first two decades <strong>of</strong> democraticgovernance. The question <strong>of</strong> how to manage national economic development hasfeatured as a major sticking point in the struggle, where revolutionary forces arerepresented by those desiring far-reaching redistributive change in society, <strong>and</strong>reactionary forces represented by those who seek the maintenance <strong>of</strong> the marketorientedstatus quo, whether whites or blacks hold the levers <strong>of</strong> economic power.Yet the foreign policy <strong>of</strong> the African National Congress upon its accession to powerin 1994 did mark, in some respects, a sharp turnaround in South Africa’sinternational posture. The country eschewed military means <strong>of</strong> resolving conflicts,<strong>and</strong> in a decision taken under the last apartheid government in 1990, its nuclearcapability was unceremoniously dismantled. 344 Although this decision was not takenby the new ANC government, <strong>and</strong> was in fact taken, in the view <strong>of</strong> some, t<strong>of</strong>orestall the possibility <strong>of</strong> an ANC government possessing nuclear weapons, 345 noattempt was later made to reverse it. In fact, the ANC took a principled decision infavour <strong>of</strong> ‘blending down’ South Africa’s enriched uranium, rather than see it sold343 UN General Assembly, Resolution 449 (V), “Question <strong>of</strong> South West Africa”, 13December 1950. Accessed online at: http://daccess-ddsny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/060/47/IMG/NR006047.pdf?OpenElementon15 October, 2010.344 J.W. De Villiers, Roger Jardine, <strong>and</strong> Mitchell Reiss, “Why South Africa Gave Up theBomb”, Foreign Affairs, 72, Issue 5 (1993): 98.345 See David Albright <strong>and</strong> Mark Hibbs, “South Africa: The ANC <strong>and</strong> the atom bomb”,Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the Atomic Scientists, 49, No.3 (1993).151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!