12.07.2015 Views

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ealists theorise a state that is more responsive to domestic imperatives <strong>and</strong> thusmore constrained by them. 163The aspects <strong>of</strong> the neoclassical realism research agenda that are directly relevant tothis thesis are:- The international structure as a decisive factor in the foreign policycalculations <strong>of</strong> states;- The differential between national power <strong>and</strong> state power; <strong>and</strong>,- The nature <strong>of</strong> unit-level intervening variables, in this case governing parties,individual leaders, <strong>and</strong> perception.Each <strong>of</strong> these aspects is now discussed in turn.3.2.1 The systemic dimensionThe primary system characteristics affecting the choice <strong>of</strong> foreign policy goals <strong>and</strong>means include: system polarity, the distribution <strong>of</strong> power in the system; <strong>and</strong>, therules <strong>of</strong> the game. 164 The systemic dimension <strong>of</strong> international life is highly relevantto intermediate states. Intermediate states gain their identity from their positionrelative to other states. They are either stronger than the weaker states, or weakerthan their more powerful counterparts. At the same time, the relative distribution <strong>of</strong>power in the system affects foreign policy decisions because a change in relativedistribution might necessitate a responsive action by an intermediate state, eitherwithin its own region, or extra-regionally. The balance <strong>of</strong> power dynamic frames theperceptions <strong>and</strong> decisions <strong>of</strong> decision-makers at the unit level. This dynamicemploys two central assumptions: 1) Anarchy – or the lack <strong>of</strong> any central decidingpower - as a constraint on states’ behaviour; <strong>and</strong>, 2) The relative distribution <strong>of</strong>power among states.163 See as an indicative account Jonathan D. Caverley, “Power <strong>and</strong> DemocraticWeakness: Neoconservatism <strong>and</strong> Neoclassical Realism”, Millennium, 38, No.3 (2010).164 Valerie Hudson, Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic <strong>and</strong> Contemporary Theory(Plymouth: Rowman <strong>and</strong> Littlefield Publishers, 2007): 27.87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!