12.07.2015 Views

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

Download - LSE Theses Online - London School of Economics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

colonial state. 136 The commitment to the sovereignty <strong>of</strong> the state was evenembraced in the call for a New International Economic Order in the 1970s, adem<strong>and</strong> that limited the issues <strong>of</strong> contention to states. 137Just as it did among industrialised countries, the dialectic relationship betweennationalism <strong>and</strong> internationalism played out in newly-independent states, with itseffects both in the international arena <strong>and</strong> domestically. Importantly, while it wouldbe anachronistic to speak <strong>of</strong> ‘internationalism’ existing between Africans <strong>and</strong> Asiansbefore the end <strong>of</strong> colonialism in the middle <strong>of</strong> the last century, the roots <strong>of</strong> laterinternationalism, embodied in what would become state foreign policies, can betraced to the ideologies <strong>and</strong> convictions <strong>of</strong> sub- <strong>and</strong> pre-nation state formations,such as political parties (like the African National Congress in South Africa, <strong>and</strong> theIndian National Congress in India): here, the roots <strong>of</strong> internationalism were nationalist.Hence, this form <strong>of</strong> internationalism prized the hard-won sovereignty <strong>of</strong> developingcountries, even at the expense <strong>of</strong> individual human rights. This str<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>internationalism was exemplified by the principles <strong>of</strong> the Panchsheel, which included,as aforementioned: mutual respect for each other’s territorial integrity <strong>and</strong>sovereignty; non-aggression; non-interference in each others’ internal affairs;equality <strong>and</strong> mutual benefit; <strong>and</strong>, peaceful coexistence.The question has been raised whether international solidarity still requires thenation-state. 138 This question is highlighted by the entry into government <strong>of</strong> the leftin a number <strong>of</strong> pivotal states worldwide, a trend that has arguably changed thenature <strong>of</strong> the state, <strong>and</strong> potentially, the nature <strong>of</strong> solidarity. However, “(The State<strong>of</strong>fers) a manageable (albeit top-heavy) site within which the working poor canmake limited claims on power, <strong>and</strong> have at least some opportunity to affect the waythey are ruled”. 139 The North-South divide still animates a variety <strong>of</strong> majorinternational issue areas, such as the global climate talks, the stalled Doha Round <strong>of</strong>the World Trade Organisation (WTO), <strong>and</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> conflicts on whichdeveloped countries differ with the developing world. The state is still beingvociferously contested in many so-called Third World locales: it is still a treasured136 Ibid.137 Cox, “Ideologies <strong>and</strong> NIEO”, 259.138 Brennan, “Cosmopolitanism <strong>and</strong> Internationalism”.139 Ibid., 75.73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!