27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

positive effect of the number of activated integrins on the total amount of available<br />

integrin molecules. The activation of integrins will hence influence the mechanical<br />

model since stretching of the integrins is not only dependent on the external load but<br />

also on the number of integrins. Furthermore, the ERK pathway also has an influence on<br />

the mechanics of the cell, generating an additional feedback mechanism within the<br />

model. More specifically, ERK can stimulate the Rho/ROCK pathway and Rhoassociated<br />

protein kinase (ROCK) promotes the polymerisation of actin proteins into<br />

actin filaments and the assembly of actin filaments into stress fibers [10]. This feedback<br />

is modelled through the stimulation of the formation of actin components in the<br />

mechanical model by the ERK pathway. The more springs in parallel the stiffer they are<br />

combined, reducing their stretch. An overview of the model with its feedback<br />

mechanisms is shown in figure 3.<br />

4. RESULTS & DISCUSSION<br />

We compared the response of ERK signaling in static and dynamic loads, since this has<br />

been shown to differ in cartilage explants. In addition, different parameter settings were<br />

applied in order to examine the sensitivity of the model to the parameters describing the<br />

interaction between the biological and mechanical part of the model, and to get an idea<br />

of the influence of the mechanical parameters on the ERK response.<br />

The modelled ERK response to a<br />

static load, a dynamic load with a<br />

high frequency and a dynamic<br />

load with a low frequency are<br />

depicted in figure 4. The<br />

modelled response qualitatively<br />

resembles the response described<br />

in the literature [2]. The<br />

oscillation is the result of the<br />

interplay between repeated<br />

activation of the ERK<br />

phosphorylation path and the<br />

deactivation and recovery of the<br />

dephosphorylation path in<br />

synchrony with the force. At<br />

higher frequencies the<br />

dephosphorylation does not get<br />

the time to recover.<br />

The influence of the mechanical<br />

parameters as well as the<br />

influence of the interaction<br />

parameters on the model were<br />

tested for static and dynamic<br />

loading. Variations in integrin<br />

stiffness, nucleus stiffness and<br />

substrate stiffness have a large<br />

effect on the ERK response. The<br />

substrate component and the<br />

integrin-actin-nucleus part are in<br />

Fig. 4 Modelled ERK phosphorylation in response to a static and two<br />

dynamic loads: one with a frequency of 0.053 Hz and one with a<br />

frequency of 0.00053 Hz.<br />

Fig. 5 The response of ERK to a static force with the influence of a<br />

variation in the substrate stiffness [Pa].<br />

parallel in the mechanical model. Therefore the deformation in those branches is the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!