27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

elease and absorption of the heparin. According to [10], the diffusivity of the drug in<br />

the arterial wall Dw and in the lumen Dl are set equal to 7.7x10 -6 mm 2 /s and 1.5x10 -4<br />

mm 2 /s. Concerning the interaction involving drug and ligand/receptor we apply a model<br />

from [11] where the binding reaction constants are kon =10 2 s -1 and koff=10 -2 s -1 and the<br />

average concentration of receptors in the tissue is set to bw,0 =5 (we recall that all data<br />

refer to non-dimensional concentrations with respect to the reference value ĉ, which is<br />

the drug saturation level in water). For the modeling of the stent struts we assume a<br />

circular section radius equal to Rs =0.052 mm which represents the equivalent radius<br />

accounting for the stent thickness. We assume that the initial drug charge, cs, is 10 times<br />

ĉ. In order to evaluate the drug delivery to the arterial wall, we define the dose which is<br />

the time-averaged drug concentration at each point of the arterial wall defined as<br />

T<br />

d (x) = T w −1 ∫ c (t,x)dt eq. (1)<br />

w<br />

0<br />

where cw(t,x) represents the total drug concentration within the arterial tissue given by<br />

the sum of free aw(t,x) and bound drug (bw,0-bw(t,x)) and its mean value<br />

dw(V) = V −1 M (d w ,V) where V represents the control volume. All data refer to the time T<br />

when the drug in the stent coating has been released (T= 6h 20').<br />

The results are evaluated over four different regions of the coronary bifurcation (Fig. 2):<br />

the whole volume of the bifurcation (V-TOT), the proximal part of the MB (V-MBP),<br />

the distal part of the MB (V-MBD) and the SB region (V-SB).<br />

Figure 2: Regions of the coronary bifurcation: whole region (grey), proximal main<br />

branch (V-MBP), distal main branch (V-MBD) and side branch region (V-SB).<br />

In order to evaluate the drug waste due to either the incomplete stent apposition or the<br />

stent struts overlapping in the case of multiple stent implantation, we consider for both<br />

the procedures an idealized configuration in which all the stent struts are perfectly<br />

apposed to the arterial wall.<br />

4. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

For each stenting procedure, we report the total amount of drug delivered to V-TOT, V-<br />

MBP, V-MBD and V-SB.<br />

The delivered drug is quantified by means of bars for both the realistic and idealized<br />

cases. The concentration scale refers to non-dimensional concentration units relative to<br />

the saturation level of dissolved drug in water.<br />

First, comparing the two configurations we observe that the drug dose is higher in all<br />

the four regions when the two-stent technique is performed. Moreover, the analysis of<br />

drug dosage over the four different regions (Fig. 3) gives rise to interesting<br />

considerations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!