27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

u dV<br />

V u. (Eq. 2)<br />

V<br />

The permeability K is then determined by the equation 1. In our case, the size of the<br />

spherical pores in our bioceramics (radius about 300m) leads to neglect the influence<br />

of the gravitation force 11-12 .<br />

There are many empirical models to predict the permeability K but only for packed beds<br />

or granular porous media. To use theses models the interconnected spherical pores of<br />

our bioceramics porous media must become the “spaces” of the packed bed or of the<br />

granular porous media.<br />

3. Validation of the numerical model.<br />

To validate the numerical model, an academic 3D case of a porous medium was tested<br />

(similar to Fig. 2). The variation of the distance between the uniform cubes (edge size 1<br />

mm) allows fixing a porosity ranging from 0.2 to 0.8. This porous medium is isotropic<br />

and its structure is periodic. So, we are able to simplify the simulation using the UC<br />

(Fig.2b) instead of the REV. The procedure above mentioned (for a structured grid and<br />

a pressure gradient equal to 20 Pa.m -1 imposed in one couple of periodic boundary<br />

condition) leads to the fields of velocity and of pressure shown in the figure 4.<br />

(a) (b)<br />

Fig.4. Fields of velocity (a) and fields of pressure (b) in UC.<br />

The permeability K of this porous medium was then calculated and compared with the<br />

results issued from classical models. Note that the second order tensor K becomes a<br />

scalar in this case; we need only to solve the Navier-Stokes equations by applying a<br />

pressure gradient in one direction. The table 1 shows the permeability determined<br />

through three empirical models: Ergun 13-14 , Carman-Kozeny 15 , Rumpf-Guptes 16 , an<br />

analytical model: Du Plessis 17 and our numerical simulation method.<br />

Porosity Ergun’model<br />

3<br />

K <br />

2<br />

2<br />

d 150 1 <br />

Carman-<br />

Kozeny<br />

3<br />

K <br />

2<br />

2<br />

d 1801 <br />

Rumpf-<br />

Gupte<br />

5.5<br />

K <br />

2<br />

d 5.6<br />

Du Plessis<br />

1 2<br />

3 3<br />

K<br />

11 11 <br />

2<br />

4<br />

d<br />

3 411 <br />

Numerical<br />

simulation<br />

0.4 1.185E-003 9.877E-004 1.156E-003 7.930E-004 1.022E-003<br />

0.5 3.333E-003 2.778E-003 3.946E-003 2.190E-003 2.749E-003<br />

0.6 9.000E-003 7.500E-003 1.076E-002 5.742E-003 6.955E-003<br />

0.7 2.541E-002 2.117E-002 2.511E-002 1.542E-002 1.761E-002<br />

Tab.1. Dimensionless permeability according to the porosity and to the model (d mean<br />

particle diameter of the spherical granular medium).<br />

For an isotropic porous medium , the numerical simulation is close to the Duplessis's<br />

model as shown by the results (tab.1).<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!