27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

With the following boundary conditions:<br />

zz(0, t) PA ( t)<br />

(2)<br />

u( h, t) 0<br />

(3)<br />

Where zz(z,t) is the axial partial stress of the solid matrix, k is the strain-dependent<br />

intrinsic permeability and PA is the contact pressure applied on articular cartilage<br />

surface. The contact pressure was obtained by dividing the normal contact force by the<br />

tibio-femoral contact area. This contact area is known to vary as a function of knee joint<br />

angle [11]. Surface displacement was found by solving Eq. (1). Simulating cartilage<br />

displacement during gait starting from rest (i.e. zero initial conditions) is not a realistic<br />

condition. Therefore, for each subject, a constant load equivalent to one body weight<br />

was first simulated during 15 minutes prior to the simulation performed with contact<br />

loads during gait. The amplitude of this preloading represents the tibio-femoral contact<br />

load of a person standing up. Time increment (t) and space increment (z) were set to<br />

0.025 s and 0.25·h respectively during the preloading simulation and to 1/120 s and<br />

0.25·h respectively during the gait simulation. Material properties used in this study<br />

were taken from literature. Surface friction force () was estimated from this equation:<br />

( t) ( t) F ( t)<br />

(4)<br />

eff contact<br />

Where eff is the efficient friction coefficient and Fcontact is the normal (compressive)<br />

contact force. The efficient friction coefficient was defined as:<br />

s <br />

2 pt () <br />

eff ( t)<br />

eq 11 (5)<br />

PA() t <br />

Where s is the solid content, p(t) is the interstitial fluid pressure, and eq is the<br />

equilibrium friction coefficient. Solid content was assumed to be 0.2 and 0.15<br />

respectively for healthy articular cartilage and OA articular cartilage. The equilibrium<br />

friction coefficient was taken from Bell et al. [12] for dynamic loadings and were set<br />

respectively to 0.03 and 0.075 for healthy and OA articular cartilage. Interstitial fluid<br />

pressure was obtained by solving momentum equation for the fluid phase which gives:<br />

f<br />

h <br />

f<br />

p() t s<br />

v z, t v z, tdz<br />

(6)<br />

0 k<br />

Where v s and v f are respectively the velocity of the solid phase and the fluid phase. The<br />

velocity of the solid phase was obtained by taking the derivative of the articular<br />

cartilage displacement with respect to spatial coordinate and the velocity of the fluid<br />

phase was obtained by solving the continuity equation:<br />

f f<br />

s s v z, t v z, t<br />

0<br />

(7)<br />

Where denotes the spatial gradient. Results for each subject for the surface friction<br />

force, the normal contact force applied, and the friction coefficient were resampled and<br />

then averaged over one gait cycle. Statistical ANOVA analysis was performed to<br />

determine whether significant differences exist between healthy and OA articular<br />

cartilage for the normal contact force applied the friction coefficient and the surface<br />

friction force.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!