27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of 24 shell elements, while the interior fluid was modeled by 384 eight noded brick<br />

elements. Impact loading was simulated by applying a pressure-time history to a<br />

circular cap with sector half angle 15º on the exterior of the shell. A Hanning squared<br />

function was used, which is a reasonable approximation of actual impact loading. 4 [3]<br />

Fig. 1: Diagram of Young and Morfey’s fluid-filled spherical shell model. [3]<br />

A sensitivity study was performed, consisting of a range of simulated impacts with<br />

varying impact duration Tp, while all other parameters, including the peak impact force<br />

F0, were held constant. As impact duration was lowered Young and Morfey observed<br />

that the intracranial pressure behavior began to deviate from the “quasi-static” response.<br />

The quasi-static response is analogous to the hydrostatic pressure at a certain depth<br />

within a fluid-filled container, which is caused by gravity. In a similar fashion, during<br />

comparatively long duration impacts (typically 3 ms or greater), the skull is<br />

predominantly subjected to rigid-body linear acceleration. As so, the intracranial<br />

pressure can be described by Equation 1:<br />

[Equation 1]<br />

Where: r (/m) is the distance in the x-direction from the central (coronal) plane of the<br />

brain, P(r) (/Pa) is the pressure at this point, and m (/kg) is the mass of the skull-brain<br />

system. [3] Hence for a quasi-static response one expects peak positive pressure in the<br />

brain to occur directly beneath the point of impact (the coup), varying linearly through<br />

to a peak negative pressure (of equal magnitude) diametrically opposite the impact (the<br />

contrecoup). This pressure behavior is prevalent in both numerical and cadaveric head<br />

impact literature, in which it is unusual to investigate low duration impacts.<br />

For quasi-static behavior the magnitude of the peak positive and negative pressures do<br />

not depend on impact duration, only on the maximum load. A portion of Young and<br />

Morfey’s results are presented below, see Fig. 2. For comparatively long to medium<br />

duration impacts (10 ms to 3 ms) the intracranial pressures at the coup and contrecoup<br />

rise and fall with the applied load and the peak pressures remain constant, clearly<br />

indicating quasi-static behavior as was expected. However as impact duration is reduced<br />

to 1 ms, the peak pressures observed become significantly greater than predicted by the<br />

4 Hanning squared pressure time history given by:<br />

where<br />

[Equation 2]<br />

[Equation 3]<br />

t is time, Tp is the duration of the applied load, F0 is the maximum force in the x-direction, a is the inner<br />

radius of the skull, and φ is the loading area sector half angle. [3]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!