27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fig.1: Frontal view on all subchondral bone surfaces relative based on the plane of the joint surface. The<br />

colour indicates the different bone distances (colourbar [mm]). At the top, the joint surfaces of the right<br />

side (PSJR, AMSJR, CCJR) and at the bottom the joint surfaces of the left side (PSJL, AMSJL, CCJL)<br />

are shown.<br />

Fig.2: Right calcaneus and the associated joint areas<br />

The area and 3D orientation of the three separated subchondral bone areas of the joint<br />

surfaces were calculated. Based on these results, the percentage of directional<br />

asymmetry (%DA) between the right and the left hind foot was calculated. This method<br />

standardizes all raw asymmetric differences to %DA for direct comparison of<br />

asymmetries in dimensions of different size [15].<br />

%DA = (right – left)/(average of left and right) x 100<br />

The results of the area and 3D orientation of all separated subchondral bone areas of the<br />

joint surfaces were statistically analysed with a paired t-test (alpha = 0.05).<br />

RESULTS<br />

Intraindividual differences (%DA) for the subchondral bone area of the joint surface<br />

areas, were less than -3 %DA for the PSJ, -1 %DA for the AMSJ and -3 %DA for the<br />

CCJ. Differences in 3D orientation of the joint surface were between -1 %DA and 1<br />

%DA. None of these differences was statistically significant. Interindividual variations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!