27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 4 - Correlation between FE and experimental results as bridge and sheath stiffness varies relative to lamellar<br />

stiffness. Value “-1” on the horizontal axis refers to a lamellar/bridge stiffness ratio of 1:0.1, value “2” refers to the<br />

ratio 1:100 and value “5” refers to ratio 1:100,000.<br />

For the bridge model, there was very little change in the correlation of the FE results<br />

with the experimental data, as shown in Figure 4. Although a marked change in<br />

boundary shape was seen in Figure 3, as the bridges are only acting on the internal<br />

boundaries in concentrated areas, these become averaged out over the whole length of<br />

the boundary when the correlation is considered.<br />

A slight improvement was seen in the correlation between the sheath model and the<br />

experimental data as the stiffness of the sheath increased. This however does not<br />

necessarily indicate that the model is becoming more accurate. Because the sheath<br />

elements are acting along the entire length of the boundary, as their stiffness increases<br />

the model becomes stabilised. The shape of the deformed boundary is smoother and<br />

overall closer to the experimental data. This does not necessarily mean the<br />

characteristic deformation of the experimental deformation has been more accurately<br />

represented.<br />

5. DISCUSSION<br />

The experimental study presented used similar methodologies to those employed by<br />

Pezowicz et al. 4 . Some similar observations were also recorded. In particular,<br />

throughout the test samples, images showed the cross bridges remained taut whilst the<br />

surrounding tissue constituents strained and deformed more, causing the interlamellar<br />

boundary to pucker. The greater resistance of the bridges to the strain applied implies<br />

that the material properties of the bridges differ to those of the surrounding tissues.<br />

These experimental observations suggest that the structure of the cross bridge network<br />

aids the resistance of the tissue to delamination.<br />

The computational model was built from only one specimen. More models could be<br />

created from more specimens to build greater confidence in the findings. The<br />

computational study has allowed the characteristic deformations of the tissue observed<br />

during the experimental study to be captured in a simulation that facilitates detailed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!