27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

spinal behavior except the maximal strain on the lateral spot. This could be due to the<br />

strain concentration in this area, as it is quite close to the anterior-posterior connection.<br />

4.2 Influence of spinal degeneration on cortical shell strain<br />

Since the degenerated FE models<br />

cannot be validated, it is assumed that<br />

these models do correctly predict the<br />

behavior of degenerated spines as it<br />

was shown for the healthy situation.<br />

The same loading condition was<br />

applied in all three FE models. The<br />

predicted maximum and minimum<br />

+7.231e-5<br />

-3.208e-4<br />

-7.138e-4<br />

-1.107e-3<br />

-1.500e-3<br />

-9.427e-2<br />

Figure 2. Min. principal strain [] distribution<br />

in L4 with ventral and lateral spots<br />

principal strains from the three models were compared (Figure 3). For the fully<br />

degenerated model the maximum principal strain increased on both spots. The strain<br />

changes for the mildly degenerated model were minor with 21% for the ventral spot and<br />

quite small (-6%) for the lateral spot. The minimum principal strains increased on both<br />

measurement spots with the progress of spinal degeneration. On the ventral spot, the<br />

strain increased by 10% and 68% for mildly and fully degenerated models, respectively.<br />

The lateral right spot showed the strain increases of 16% and 77% respectively.<br />

Figure 3. Principal strain changes for the different FE models<br />

In order to find out more about the spinal degeneration mechanism, a sensitivity study<br />

was performed to investigate the influence of degeneration induced material property<br />

change and disc geometry change on cortical shell strain separately. To do this, two<br />

more types of models were created: one with only the degeneration induced material<br />

property changes and the other with only the degeneration induced geometry changes.<br />

Then the same loading scenario was simulated. The predicted principal strains from the<br />

different models were compared (Figure 4). For the fully degenerated models,<br />

maximum and minimum strains on both spots showed deviations of less than 5%, if<br />

only degeneration induced geometry changes were considered. The strains were<br />

decreased by 19% and 24% for the ventral and lateral spots of the minimum strain and<br />

12% and 37% for the ventral and lateral spots of the maximum strain. For mildly and<br />

fully degenerated model, both minimum and maximum principal strains increased on<br />

both measurement sites due to degeneration induced material property changes. The<br />

minimum strain increased by 29% and 39% for the mild, and 33% and 77% for the full<br />

degeneration of the ventral and lateral spot, respectively. The maximum strains<br />

increased by 31% and 19% for the mild, and 57% and 38% for the full degeneration<br />

models of the ventral and lateral spot, respectively.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!