27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

compartments as well as a single muscle force are presented (Figure 4) as a first<br />

approximation, similar to that described within the work of [8]. The process was<br />

simplified by astutely choosing the arbitrary virtual displacement when all the wrenches<br />

are to equilibrate. For instance, we took as the small displacement the IAK which is<br />

reciprocal to the five workless constraints in Figure 1.<br />

The instrumented knee data for the trunk-sway gait trials for the data sets were<br />

compared to the model prediction. The predicted maximum medial contact force—<br />

642N, which was scaled to subject’s body weight (BW) as 1.01, as referred to in Figure<br />

4. The maximum in vivo medial contact force that was reported ranged from 1.2 to 2.0<br />

BW, typically remaining between 1.2 and 1.7 BW [1]. These results could be an<br />

indicator of our framework performance. During the initial contact of the foot with the<br />

ground (the first 25% of the stance phase in Figure 4), where the muscle contraction is<br />

thought to be passive, the two curves were closely matched.<br />

5. DISCUSSION<br />

Figure 3: Model predictions of the<br />

individual force contributions from<br />

the GRF in terms of the medial<br />

compartment, lateral compartment,<br />

and total muscle force during the<br />

stance phase using the IAK. The<br />

second peak is a result of the<br />

quadriceps identified during actual<br />

measurements and confirmed in this<br />

approach. As a limitation, the<br />

model here was constructed with<br />

only one muscle group.<br />

Figure 4:<br />

A comparison between the results of this<br />

theoretical approach and those data<br />

gathered from an instrumented knee<br />

acquired during trunk-sway gait trials [1].<br />

The force in the medial compartment is<br />

compared between Predicted and<br />

Measured values. As a limitation, the<br />

model applied a single muscle force. Also<br />

note that the magnitude is consistently<br />

lower than the measured entry due to the<br />

lack of inertial effects included for the<br />

lower limb. A similar trend is evident in<br />

both approaches.<br />

The purpose of this study was to obtain the desired reciprocal configuration diagrams<br />

connecting the instantaneous screw to the external reaction in the estimation of<br />

constraint forces. By the careful generation of the knee ISA, the workless constraints are<br />

connected to the IAK with their virtual works being automatically zero, then only the<br />

muscle forces are to equilibrate to the GRF. The connection diagram is very easy to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!