27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

catheterization mean measurements (e.g. [4, 8, 9]). In [10], a multistep procedure has<br />

been devised to construct a lumped-parameter model representative of the right and left<br />

pulmonary trees based on measured flow waveforms at the inlet and two outlets and<br />

pressure data at a location inside the 3D domain and in the left atrium. In [11], an<br />

involved multiscale automatic tuning procedure has been constructed to match typical<br />

pressure waveform features at the abdominal aortic inlet and features from the measured<br />

infrarenal flow waveform. In [12], a simple automatic tuning algorithm has been<br />

proposed to construct Windkessel models to represent the pulmonary tree downstream<br />

of each pulmonary artery outlet, based on the measured inlet flow data, pulmonary flow<br />

split (fig. 1) and transpulmonary pressure gradient, and on morphometric data. It was<br />

further assumed that on average flow to each small outlet was proportional to its crosssection<br />

with a power law. This is the method used for the results section.<br />

However, such algorithms have to be devised depending on where the measurements<br />

are done and “trusted” [13]. When a surrogate of a pressure measurement is done (such<br />

as wedge pressures), then to localize the pressure measurement in the 3D model is not<br />

straightforward. In such cases, boundary conditions have to be constructed in coherence<br />

with these data. Moreover, if a first subset of measured hemodynamics data gives rise<br />

for example to a simulated pressure loss in the 3D model that is incoherent with the<br />

other measured data, then an iterative process between clinicians and modelers is<br />

necessary to devise boundary conditions that are representative of the patient’s state.<br />

4. RESULTS<br />

Patient-specific 3D model of the PAs and SVC were constructed from MRI data on five<br />

pre-stage 3 (Glenn) patients (fig. 1). Velocity was prescribed at the inlet based on the<br />

measured flow and Windkessel outlet boundary conditions were constructed as<br />

described in the methods section [12]. The resulting total left and right resistances were<br />

not the same (e.g 1658*10 5 kg.s -1 .m -4 vs 671*10 5 kg.s -1 .m -4 for the last patient of fig.1).<br />

The resistances were even more different at the all the outlets [14]. 3D pulsatile<br />

simulations resulted in low wall shear stress (potentially deleterious for these patients)<br />

and complex pressure waveform at the SVC which dampens after the anastomosis.<br />

Although the five patients anatomies varied largely, energy loss correlated strongly with<br />

cardiac index (linear correlation, R 2 =0.94), and was in low (a few mW). The complex<br />

flow observed until the first bifurcations can explain why imaging flow in such<br />

locations is challenging (fig. 1). The results confirmed that pressure measurements<br />

would need to be much more accurate than currently to be prescribed at the different<br />

outlets, since pressure losses in the 3D domain were around 1mmHg. We highlighted<br />

common features among the five patients, but the results demonstrated clearly<br />

differences in the main indicators presented above and in 3D maps (fig. 1), motivating<br />

the search for virtual surgical designs specific to each patient.<br />

Subsequently, for the five patients above, virtual surgical designs of the stage 3 Fontan<br />

palliation were explored [14]: the artificial graft sutured on one end to the IVC can be<br />

attached to the Glenn anastomosis at its other end in different ways. Typical “Tjunctions”,<br />

or with an offset towards the left lung, and several non-conventional “Yjunctions”<br />

were compared in terms of energy, wall shear stress, venous pressure and<br />

hepatic factors distribution between the right and left lungs (linked to pulmonary<br />

arteriovenous malformations) – see fig. 1. Overall the “Y” design led to better<br />

performances, but design should be customized for individual patients. In fact, for each

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!