27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 2: Average of predicted laxity kinematics and experimental kinematics for VV laxity test<br />

including standard deviations<br />

External rotation border - Simulation<br />

Internal rotation border - Simulation<br />

External rotation border - Experiment<br />

Internal rotation border - Experiment<br />

Valgus rotation border - Simulation<br />

Varus rotation border - Simulation<br />

Valgus rotation border - Experiment<br />

Varus rotation border - Experiment<br />

Posterior transl. border - Simulation<br />

Anterior transl. border - Simulation<br />

Posterior transl. border - Experiment<br />

Anterior transl. border - Experiment<br />

Figure 3: Average predicted laxity kinematics in comparison to the experimentally determined laxities<br />

for IE and AP laxity test including standard deviations<br />

The averaged RMSD between the kinematics predictions for the VV laxity test was 0.9°<br />

± 0.4° for the valgus border of rotation, and 0.8° ± 0.2° for the varus border of motion.<br />

Applying a low compression load, the averaged RMSD for the IE laxity test was 4.2° ±<br />

2.2°, for the internal border of rotation, and 4.0° ± 1.1° for the external border of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!