27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

When creating the degenerated FE models, the angle between load and L4 vertebra was<br />

kept constant. Scaling of the discs causes the angles between L3 and L4 as well as L4<br />

and L5 to deviate slightly from the angles of the healthy model (Figure 1). Nevertheless,<br />

the disc height decrease is mainly in the direction of the applied load. As a result, the<br />

disc geometry changes cause no significant deviation of internal forces, stresses and<br />

therefore strains in the cortical shell (Figure 1).<br />

a) Healthy model (b) Mild degeneration (c) Full degeneration<br />

Figure 1. FE models with different grades of degeneration<br />

4. RESULTS<br />

4.1 Validation of the FE model<br />

Since it is impossible to experimentally mimic the spinal degeneration in a specimen,<br />

the validation can only be performed for the healthy FE model which was achieved by<br />

mechanically testing the healthy specimen.<br />

Table 3. Comparison of FE prediction with experiment data<br />

displacement [mm] discal pressure [MPa] principal strain []<br />

U2 a U3 b L3-L4 L4-L5<br />

max. min.<br />

ventral lateral ventral lateral<br />

Experiment -2.47 1.50 1.43 1.58 403.4 634.8 -441.6 -873.8<br />

FEM -2.73 1.46 1.47 1.39 426.5 807.6 -439.9 -789.1<br />

Deviation -10.6% 2.5% -2.7% 12.1% -5.1% -26.1% 0.3% 10.3%<br />

a U2: vertical axis; b U3: anteroposterior axis<br />

As there were some modifications of the previous developed FE model, the validation<br />

was repeated in this study to ensure the appropriateness of the model. The healthy FE<br />

model was exerted to a load of 2000N in the axial direction. The calculated results were<br />

compared with the experimental measurement [18] (Table 3). The model predicted the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!