27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the different virtual surgical designs of these patients, with the “Y” shape often less<br />

sensitive to this parameter [14]. Sensitivities of the results to rest versus exercise<br />

conditions, or with respiration effects are other examples of robustness tests [6, 14, 17].<br />

5.2 Predictability enhanced by 3D-closed loop model of the entire circulation<br />

The results section featured virtual surgical designs simulations with hypotheses on the<br />

boundary conditions [14]. Outlet boundary conditions were kept unchanged compared<br />

to preoperatively, state for which they were designed based on patient-specific clinical<br />

measurements as described in the methods section [12]. At the outlets, a relationship<br />

between pressure and flow was prescribed, so both could adapt to the virtual surgery<br />

where a graft was connected in different ways to the preoperative geometry and thus<br />

bringing additional flow. By contrast, flow rates were prescribed at the inlets based on<br />

preoperative PC-MRI measurements boundary conditions and hypotheses on how they<br />

might have changed from preoperatively to postoperatively. To rather predict these<br />

inflow changes, a closed-loop lumped-parameter model of the entire circulation was<br />

thus tuned for one patient to its MRI, ultrasound and catheterization pressure<br />

measurements and coupled to the 3D model [6]. Results showed that flow rates at both<br />

inlets (SVC, IVC) changed from the preoperative to the postoperative states, in<br />

coherence with physiological knowledge. Of course, the closed-loop model presents<br />

many parameters that are not easy to tune based on clinical measurements, and it<br />

remains to be validated that the parameters do not change significantly due to the<br />

surgery, but such an approach enhances the predictability potential of virtual surgeries.<br />

6. CONCLUSION<br />

In conclusion, we have presented a summary of numerical methods that we have<br />

developed for patient-specific 3D-0D simulations and shown different ways of<br />

translating patient-specific measurements into boundary conditions specification.<br />

Applications to single ventricle palliation included a 5-patient study before their Fontan<br />

surgery and, based on these preoperative data, a performance evaluation and<br />

optimization of different virtual surgical designs in which the non-conventional “Y”<br />

shape seems the most promising. Sensitivity of the results to hemodynamics input data<br />

shows that it needs to be evaluated to enhance the significance of the results. Finally,<br />

patient-specific 3D-0D closed loop lumped models present an increased predictability<br />

potential. However, boundary conditions parameter estimation remains a challenge and<br />

for which new methods are actively sought for [18].<br />

7. REFERENCES<br />

1. Vignon-Clementel IE, Marsden AL and Feinstein JA (2010) A primer on<br />

computational simulation in congenital heart disease for the clinician. Progress in<br />

Pediatric Cardiology 30: 3-13<br />

2. Vignon-Clementel IE, Figueroa CA, Jansen KE and Taylor CA (2006) Outflow<br />

boundary conditions for three-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and<br />

pressure in arteries. Comp Methods in Applied Mech and Eng 195: 3776-3796<br />

3. Moghadam ME, Bazilevs Y, Hsia T-Y, Vignon-Clementel IE, Marsden AL and<br />

Modeling Congenital Hearts A (2011) A comparison of outlet boundary treatments for<br />

prevention of backflow divergence with relevance to blood flow simulations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!