27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

problem is time consuming, which limits this approach to a small number of cases. In<br />

addition, most analyses do not account for the wide variation in material properties and<br />

geometry that may occur in natural tissues or manufacturing imperfections in synthetic<br />

materials since the underlaying information came from only a limited number of<br />

anatomical structures. Recent work started to include this variability into biomechanical<br />

analyses; Taddei et al. [4] proposed a method based on Monte Carlo simulations to<br />

include geometric and material uncertainties in finite element simulations. The<br />

technique was improved by Laz et al. [5] who proposed a probabilistic platform to<br />

account for the uncertainties in the mechanical properties for fracture risk predictions.<br />

Khalaji et al [6]. proposed to combine finite element calculations with statistical shape<br />

models (SSM). SSM has been used to represent human bone anatomy [7, 8, 9]. This<br />

method was extended to include bone mineral content in a combined statistical model of<br />

appearance (SMA) [3], which includes both anatomical and mechanical information.<br />

The purpose of the present work is to propose a technique to reduce the computational<br />

time to build and solve patient specific models. The proposed method relies on a<br />

combination of statistical model of appearance and finite element analysis.<br />

3. METHODS<br />

3.1 Statistical model of appearance<br />

The SMA was built from a training set of 72 female left femur CT image series. First,<br />

the femurs were manually segmented in Amira (Visage Imaging Inc., USA) and the<br />

surface mesh was created. Subsequently, correspondence and non-rigid alignment<br />

between the 72 training instances was established using a morphing approach developed<br />

by ANSYS Inc., France. The ANSYS morpher takes as input a generic template mesh<br />

and a subject's geometry. Additionally, ten anatomical landmark points on the two<br />

meshes were recorded. Using these inputs, the algorithm based on radial basis function<br />

matches the template mesh onto the subject's geometry and generates a new volume<br />

mesh of the subject geometry, with corresponding number of nodes and elements [10].<br />

Principle component analysis (PCA) [8] was used to create the SSM from the<br />

volumetric meshes. A second statistical model for the intensities (SIM) of the CT<br />

images was created using PCA. Since the mineral content is related to the image<br />

intensity, this model corresponds to a statistical mechanical model of the bones. Both<br />

models were combined to build the SMA. The SMA was used to generate 1025 femur<br />

mesh instances, using the first five modes covering 75% of the variability of the training<br />

population. 1000 bones were used to build the training population for the FE predictions<br />

and 25 cases are used for the model validation.<br />

3.2 Finite element model<br />

An FE model was built for each femur of the dataset with a loading situation<br />

corresponding to normal walking [11]. The magnitude of the forces was scaled<br />

according to the subject's body weight. To account for the individuality of each subject,<br />

the body weight was generated based on the subject’s femur length [3] and on the<br />

training population's body mass index (26.36 ± 6.01). The loading was combined with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!