27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Typical dimensions of lumbar vertebral bodies have been taken from literature (e.g. [3])<br />

and suitable parameters have been chosen to achieve a representative shape. The final<br />

geometric model is depicted in Fig. 1 and the corresponding parameters are listed in<br />

Tab. 1.<br />

Ellipsoid Concavity:<br />

= 12 = 0.07<br />

= 21 <br />

= 18 <br />

Anterior Part: Vertebral Foramen:<br />

= 0.35 = −0.45<br />

= 90° = 270°<br />

= 40 ° = 30 °<br />

Fig. 1: Geometric model Tab. 1: Parameters of the geometric model<br />

5. THERMO-MECHANICALLY COUPLED FE-SIMULATION<br />

The geometric model has been automatically meshed using an unstructured hexahedral<br />

FE-mesh approach and material regions have been defined by assigning different<br />

material laws. Thereby, the outer elements layer represents the cortical shell of the<br />

vertebral body with isotropic elastic material behaviour. The remaining elements<br />

initially represent the cancellous bone of the vertebral body and are described by<br />

transversely isotropic linear elastic material behaviour. Furthermore, isotropic thermal<br />

behaviour is assumed for both material regions. The chosen mechanical and thermal<br />

material parameters for cortical and cancellous bone are summarized in Tab. 2.<br />

Cortical bone Cancellous bone<br />

Linear elasticity [4] Isotropic Transversal isotropic<br />

= 10 000 MPa = 200 / 140 MPa<br />

= 0.3 = 0.45 / 0.315<br />

Density [5] = 2000 kg/m = 1000 kg/m <br />

Thermal conductivity [5] = 0.4 W / m K = 0.6 W / m K<br />

Spec. heat capacity [5] = 1300 J/kg K = 4190 J/kg K<br />

Tab. 2: Material parameters of cortical and cancellous bone based on literature data<br />

Subsequently, a region representing the injected acrylic bone cement has been defined<br />

by manual picking of corresponding elements of the cancellous bone region. The<br />

material behaviour of the chosen elements has been reassigned by the developed<br />

material model described in section 2. In our example depicted in Fig. 2 (left), the<br />

defined bone cement region corresponds to an ideal symmetrical, bipedicular injection<br />

procedure with two fillings each consisting of around 4.5 ml (~ 15 % of the total<br />

vertebral body volume for each plug).<br />

In order to save computational time, symmetries of the model have been utilized.<br />

Therefore, thermal and mechanical symmetry conditions have been applied (cf. Fig. 2<br />

right). Moreover, zero displacement conditions in all directions have been applied to<br />

one single node in order to prevent rigid body motions. To account for the ambient<br />

region of the vertebral body, thermal boundary conditions have been adopted by<br />

applying heat convection on the cortical shell with an ambient temperature of θ∞ = 37°C<br />

and a film coefficient of hc = 1 mW/m 2 K.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!