27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the screw shaft and bone fragments was “shrink fit / no sliding.” Contact between bone<br />

fragments was “separation” and, for plate b, contact between the plate and<br />

reinforcement was “sliding / no separation.” Inventor uses a “tetra 10” style mesh (4<br />

physical points and 10 nodes for interpolation) and produced an average of 886,220<br />

nodes and 580,979 elements for the models. A local mesh of 0.5 mm was applied to<br />

regions of interest, such as screw-to-bone contacts, to provide for higher accuracy<br />

results. Four constructs were analyzed with configurations shown in table 1. Material<br />

properties used in the FEM analysis are displayed in table 2.<br />

4. RESULTS<br />

Disp. [mm]<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Max Fragment Displacement within Gap<br />

Proximal Fragment Distal Fragment<br />

Figure 3: Maximum bone fragment displacement<br />

within the osteotomy.<br />

Equivalent Strain [-]<br />

0.05<br />

0.04<br />

0.03<br />

0.02<br />

0.01<br />

0<br />

Table 2: Material properties used in FEM analysis.<br />

Material Young’s Modulus [GPa] Poisson’s Ratio Yield Strength [MPa]<br />

Titanium 102.81 0.36 275.60<br />

PEEK 13.00 0.44 355.00<br />

Cortical Bone 12.50 0.30 83.40<br />

Reinforced-Pk-Pk Reinforced-Pk-Ti Standard-Pk-Pk Standard-Ti-Ti<br />

Max Osteotomy Surface Strain<br />

Proximal Fragment Distal Fragment<br />

Figure 5: Maximum equivalent strain on the bone<br />

fragment surfaces within the osteotomy.<br />

Stress [MPa]<br />

Stress [MPa]<br />

Bone fragment displacement within the osteotomy is largest in constructs which contain<br />

screws made of PEEK thermoplastic and lowest in the Standard-Ti-Ti construct (Fig. 3).<br />

In the analysis, the three constructs using PEEK as the plate material closed the 3 mm<br />

gap at the lateral side (plate opposite) of the fracture gap. The Standard-Ti-Ti construct<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

9000<br />

6000<br />

3000<br />

0<br />

Max Osteotomy Surface Stress<br />

Proximal Fragment Distal Fragment<br />

Figure 4: Maximum Von Mises stress found on the<br />

bone fragment surfaces within osteotomy.<br />

Screw 1<br />

Max Stress by Material & Part<br />

Screw 2<br />

Screw 5<br />

Screw 6<br />

Construct Component<br />

(Reinf.)<br />

Plate<br />

Figure 6: Maximum stress for each part of each<br />

construct. (Inner Ti reinforcement of the reinforced<br />

PEEK plate included.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!