27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

presented system - parallelization of the Finite Element Method mesh generation. Also<br />

the performance tests of the parallel mesh generation tool are presented.<br />

3. SIMULATION OF TRABECULAR BONE ADAPTATION<br />

For the simulations of trabecular bone adaptation phenomenon the model developed by<br />

Huiskes [2,4] is used. The key assumption of this model is existence of homeostasis<br />

(perfect balance between bone gain and loss). This equilibrium can occur only in the<br />

presence of mechanical stimulation. The network of osteocytes plays the role of sensors<br />

of the mechanical energy distribution throughout the trabecular bone tissue. The model<br />

postulates strain energy density (SED), as a scalar measure of the mechanical<br />

stimulation and distinguishes single value of SED corresponding to trabecular bone<br />

remodeling homeostasis with the 'lazy zone' assumption - only a significant change in<br />

mechanical stimulation results in bone loss or gain. The phenomenon of trabecular bone<br />

adaptation has two important attributes. Firstly, mechanical stimulation is needed to<br />

maintain the rebuilding balance. Secondly, the process of resorption and formation<br />

occurs on the trabecular bone surface only. These factors together with the ‘regulatory<br />

model’ concept were the basis for the generic, three-dimensional system for biomimetic<br />

structural optimisation [5,6]. The developed method mimics the geometry evolution of<br />

the real bone, where the volumetric finite elements mesh and the surface of the<br />

trabecular network are controlled during the simulation with the following assumptions:<br />

where:<br />

Add an amount of material for U > (Uh + s) (1)<br />

No action - ‘lazy zone’ for (Uh – s) < U < ( Uh + s) (2)<br />

Remove an amount of material for U < ( Uh – s) (3)<br />

− Uh is the SED value corresponding to homeostasis of bone loss and gain<br />

− 2s is the size of the ‘lazy zone’<br />

The material in virtual space is added onto or removed from the surface of the structure.<br />

The structural form is changed imitating the behavior of Basic Multicellular Units<br />

(BMU), thus the change concerns always the same amount of material (tissue),<br />

independently of current values of SED according to formulas (1-3). Such a mechanism<br />

secures stability of the process and prevents rapid change in the form of the structure.<br />

The simulated remodeling process stops, if SED values on the whole surface of the<br />

structure are included into the ‘lazy zone’. The beams of trabecular bone are assumed to<br />

be made of isotropic linear elastic material, where the marrow space is treated as voids.<br />

Because the remodeling process occurs only on the surface of the trabecular bone, only<br />

the 'surface' layer of the structure is taken into consideration during the simulation<br />

process. In contrast to other voxel models, the approach adopted in this system does not<br />

relay on earlier voxel discretization, but mimics the natural evolution of the bone tissue<br />

as the biological process of bone formation and resorption. Adaptation to the<br />

mechanical stimulation results in adaptation of the trabecular bone surface position in<br />

the virtual space.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!