ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

6. REFERENCES
1. Krankenberg H, Schlüter M, Steinkamp H, Bürgelin K, Scheinert D, Schulte KL et
al. Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in
Superficial Femoral Artery Lesions up to 10 cm in Length: The Femoral Artery
Stenting Trial (FAST), Circulation, 2007; 116:285-292.
2. Laird JR, Katzen BT, Scheinert D, Lammer J, Carpenter J, Buchbinder M et al.
Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the
Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery. Twelve-Month Results
From the RESILIENT Trial, Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2010; 3(3):267-76.
3. Allie DE, Hebert CJ and Walker CM. Nitinol stent fracture in the SFA,
Endovascular Today, 2004; 22-34.
4. Scheinert D, Scheinert S, Sax J, Piorkowski C, Braunlich S, Ulrich M, Biamino G
and Schmidt A. Prevalence and clinical impact of stent frctures after
femoropopliteal stenting. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2005;
45(2):312-315.
5. Iida O, Nanto S, Uematsu M, Ikeoka K and Okamoto S. Influence of Stent Fracture
on the Long-Term Patency in the Femoro-Popliteal Artery: Experience of 4 Years, J
Am Coll Cardiol Intv, 2009; 2:665-671.
6. Duda SH, Bosiers M, Lammer J, et al. Sirolimus-eluting versus bare nitinol stent for
obstructive superficial femoral artery disease: the SIROCCO II trial, Journal of
Vascoular Interv Radiology, 2005; 16:331-338.
7. Smouse B, Nikanorov A and La Flash D. Biomechanical forces in the
femoropopliteal arterial segment, Endovascular Today, 2005; 4(6):60-66.
8. Auricchio, F., Taylor, R.L., Shape-memory alloys: modeling and numerical
simulations of the finite-strain superelastic behaviour, Computer methods in Applied
Mechanics and Engineering, 1997, 143: 175-194.
9. Mewissen MW. Primary nitinol stenting for femoropopliteal disease, Journal of
Endovascular Therapy, 2009; 16(II):1163-1181.
10. Dick P, Wallner H, Sabeti S, Loewe C, Mlekusch W, Lammer J et al. Balloon
angioplasty versus stenting with Nitinol stents in intermediate length superficial
femoral artery lesions, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2009;
74:1090-1095.
11. Nikanorov A, Smouse HB, Osman K, Bialas M, Shrivastava S and Schwartz LB.
Fracture of self-expanding nitinol stents stressed in vitro under simulated
intravascular condition, J Vasc Surg, 2008; 48:435-440.
12. Kleinstreuer C, Li Z, Basciano CA, Seelecke S and Farber MA. Computational
mechanics of Nitinol stent grafts, Journal of Biomechanics, 2008; 41:2370-2378.
13. Pelton AR, Schroeder V, Mitchell MR, Gong XY, Barney M and Robertson SW.
Fatigue and durability of Nitinol stents. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of
Biomedical Materials I. 2008; 153-164.
This work is within the project ‘‘RT3S - Real Time Simulation for Safer vascular
Stenting’’ partially funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework
Programme, GA FP7-2009-ICT-4-248801