27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dynamic cell seeding combines two complex phenomena: cellular adhesion and fluid<br />

flow. Theoretical models can offer a better controlled and systematic approach for the<br />

optimization of cell seeding process compared to the experimental approach. Olivares<br />

and Lacroix [15] proposed a numerical method based on fluid particles to control the<br />

cell seeding process under perfusion conditions. The models are checked with final<br />

results obtained from the experiment and two principal limitations were found: (1) the<br />

seeding process in time cannot be verified, and (2) final particles distribution was<br />

compared with only the experimental cell distribution at the end of the seeding process.<br />

For this study a combination of computational experimental methods are proposed to<br />

optimize the cell seeding process. The general overview of this study is represented in<br />

Fig. 1.<br />

Fig. 1. Overview scheme represent the methods used in the study. (a) regular scaffold<br />

(CAD from Biotek company), (b) Transparent micro-fluidic chamber.<br />

3. MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

3.1 Computational approach<br />

Rapid prototyped poly-caprolactone (PCL) scaffold of diameter 5 mm and height 1.5<br />

mm (3D Biotek, USA) (Fig.1a) was used. A micro-fluidic chamber was designed and<br />

fabricated to enable live visualization of the seeding process (Fig 1b). Three samples of<br />

PCL scaffold were scanned using a μCT Skyscan1172 (Trabeculae, Spain) with a<br />

resolution of 4.9 μm. The cross section of one sample is shown in Fig. 2a to show the<br />

distribution of pores. Cross-sections were super-imposed using the software MIMICS<br />

(Materialize) to form a three-dimensional reconstruction of the sample (Fig.2b). A<br />

regular material distribution was showed through the μCT analysis.<br />

Fig. 2. Micro CT scaffold reconstruction. (a) segmented image (b) 3D scaffold<br />

reconstruction.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!