27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW COMPUTATIONAL TOOL FOR RAPID<br />

ANALYSIS OF IMPLANT POSITIONING EFFECTS IN TOTAL HIP<br />

REPLACEMENTS<br />

M.T. Bah 1 , V.B. Xuan 2 , S. Richards 2 , M. Nicolas 2 , G. Champion 2 , M. Browne 1 ,<br />

R.Bryan 2 and P.G. Young 2<br />

1. ABSTRACT<br />

The advent of image-based Finite Element (FE) modeling, advanced softwares and the<br />

amount of computer power are increasingly easing the pre-clinical assessment of<br />

implant performance in Total Hip Replacements (THRs). Computer Tomography (CT)<br />

data can be processed faster and high-quality meshes that can accurately represent the<br />

implanted femur geometries can now be generated. Accounting for variability in<br />

implant positioning, however, requires many scenarios including different combinations<br />

of alignment to be simulated and analysed. This paper shortcuts this iterative, tedious<br />

and time-consuming process by customising and applying newly developed mesh<br />

refinement and scripting tools, convenient for multiple simulations and statistical<br />

analyses. An efficient Design of Computer Experiments (DOE) is conducted; the<br />

considered femur is implanted with an implant in pre-defined positions that best sample<br />

and adequately replicate the possible combinations of ante/retroversion, varus/valgus,<br />

anterior/posterior orientations and implant offsets. The resulting micromotions are then<br />

post-processed to arrive at implant positions that correspond to the best THR<br />

performance. For a specific patient, the proposed tool can help both orthopaedic<br />

surgeons and engineers when comparing different prostheses or searching for optimal<br />

positioning.<br />

2. INTRODUCTION<br />

When a cementless THR is performed, the femur is either reamed or broached prior to<br />

press-fitting of the metal stem into the bone in a pre-defined position. Unfortunately,<br />

optimal implant positioning depends on the surgical approach, the design of the<br />

prosthesis and the subject’s anatomy even when CT-based pre-operative planning<br />

softwares and computer navigation are used. Ideally, surgeons want to cut the femur in a<br />

neutral position thereby reducing for example the difference between the anatomical<br />

and surgical reconstructed femoral anteversion [1]. An anteverted femoral stem can<br />

increase the risk of dislocation. FE-based modeling can help in accounting for the<br />

effects of variability in implant positioning. Typically, a CAD software is used to replace<br />

the implant; re-perform Boolean operations (cutting femur head, reaming, joining<br />

implant and femur, partitioning, etc...) and export the new mesh to an appropriate FE<br />

solver for solution. This process can require various computer softwares from<br />

1 Bioengineering Science Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, <strong>University</strong> of<br />

Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, England, UK<br />

2 Simpleware Ltd, Bradninch Hall, Castle Street, Exeter EX4 3PL, England, UK

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!