27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

order (PB). The particles adhered (green) (Fig. 4c) after 10 min represented a 4% of<br />

particles suspended in media. The local analysis (Fig. 4d) showed that a higher<br />

concentration of particles was found in a pore border in comparison to the number of<br />

particles on the inner cavities (IC).<br />

Fig. 4. Computational implementation (a) Velocity magnitude (b) Shear stress<br />

distributed on scaffold surface (c) Particles adhered (green) and particles suspended<br />

(gray) (d) Distribution of particles adhered on scaffold surface. Magnification of<br />

particles adhered (show adhesion zone)<br />

Fluorescent microscopy was used to observe the live motion of particles in the<br />

transparent chamber (Fig. 5a). In the centre part of the figure, the scaffold is located and<br />

in the live video the particles trajectories and the deposition of particles are shown. An<br />

acceleration of particles can be observed, when they are close to the scaffold surface.<br />

Figure 5b shows the particles distribution after 10 min. The distribution was<br />

homogeneous on the inner scaffold. The density of adhesion was higher on the pore<br />

border in comparison to inner cavities scaffold.<br />

Fig. 5. Experimental approach. (a) Life image of fluorescent particles in motion. (b)<br />

Distribution of particles adhered on scaffold surface.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!