27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fig. 5. Damage evolution of the three stent designs. The locations where the stent<br />

structure was severely damaged were indicated by circles. The legend is related to the<br />

damage parameter D.<br />

4.2 Corrosion testing of stent sample<br />

After the first day of immersion, the expanded Sample B had several broken points on<br />

struts due to corrosion while the Sample A kept the structural integrity. After 7 days of<br />

immersion, the Sample B had scattered into many pieces while the Sample A just had<br />

several broken points on struts due to corrosion (Fig. 6). From SEM observation it can<br />

be seen that the corrosion of the stent samples was combined with uniform and stress<br />

corrosion. The surfaces of the samples were covered by an oxide layer caused mainly by<br />

uniform corrosion, which were composed of dense small blocks separated by cracks.<br />

Many parts of the oxide layer had been shed from the samples and the matrices were<br />

exposed to be attacked by new uniform corrosion. This "layer by layer" mechanism was<br />

compatible with the simulation on uniform corrosion. The breaks on struts were mainly<br />

caused by stress corrosion, and many locations of the broken points are compatible with<br />

the expected locations from the simulation shown in Fig. 5.<br />

Fig. 6. The SEM observation of Samples A and B after 7 days of corrosion. The red<br />

circles indicate the breaks of struts which are compatible with the expectation in<br />

simulation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!