27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

with a distinctive set of mechanical and physiological properties, given by its<br />

complex anatomical structure [3]. Consequently, an accurate constitutive modeling<br />

regarding the biomechanical parameters of the IVD is a challenge. In addition, it<br />

may also be a very important step to fully understand the causes of DDD, even if<br />

genetics, ageing or metabolic factors also play a significant role [1].<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Fig. 1 The generic anatomical features of an IVD [1]<br />

The paramount tool for this work is a FORTRAN home-developed open source FE<br />

solver. This solver comprises several relevant features of biomechanics, namely<br />

the almost incompressibility of soft-tissues, the most general isotropic and<br />

anisotropic hyperelastic laws, viscoelastic effects, fully implicit time integration<br />

scheme and different types of finite elements [4]. Mixed u/p elements are available<br />

for monophasic simulations, but the most relevant elements for IVD modeling are<br />

the u/p-c ones, namely the linear 4-node tetrahedron (with an extra bubble node) or<br />

the quadratic 10-node tetrahedron and 27-node hexahedron [5]. In case of u/p-c<br />

elements, the continuity of the pressure field is consistent with a multiphasic<br />

formulation. Currently, biphasic formulation is implemented, considering solid and<br />

fluid parts. The innovative formulation here adopted was based on the one adopted<br />

by Huyghe (1986) [6]. The strain energy density potential W was adopted in the<br />

following form [5]:<br />

( ) = W ( C)<br />

+ W ( J ) Q<br />

C , where ( ) 2<br />

Q = − p − p and ( ) ( ) 2<br />

J = + J −1<br />

W H +<br />

1<br />

2k<br />

~<br />

k<br />

WH (1)<br />

2<br />

where W (C)<br />

and WH (J ) are, respectively, the isochoric and volumetric strain<br />

energy densities, with an additional energy term Q which has the merit of coupling<br />

the mixed formulation (displacements and pressure fields). F is the deformation<br />

T<br />

gradient, J = det(F)<br />

, and C = F F is the right Cauchy-Green strain tensor. k is a<br />

penalty parameter playing the role of a bulk modulus, p is the pressure computed from<br />

the (unknown) displacement fields and ~ p is the pressure interpolated from the<br />

(unknown) pressure field. The contribution of the isochoric strain energy density<br />

changes with the adopted hyper-visco-elastic constitutive model. Finally, in case of a<br />

biphasic formulation, the elemental stiffness matrix and the corresponding elemental<br />

system of equations can be written as:<br />

⎡K<br />

⎢<br />

⎣K<br />

UU<br />

PU<br />

K<br />

KUP<br />

⎤ ⎡Δu⎤<br />

⎡ R ⎤ ⎡FU<br />

⎤<br />

⎥ : ⎢ ⎥ = ⎢ ⎥ − ⎢ ⎥ , (2)<br />

− Kαβ<br />

⎦ ⎣Δp⎦<br />

⎣U<br />

+ T1<br />

+ T2<br />

⎦ ⎣ FP ⎦<br />

PP

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!