27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

3.1 Experiments and Data acquisition<br />

Sixteen grasping experiments were performed over 4 bottles of different sizes, weights<br />

and materials (Fig 1a). Six right-handed subjects with different anthropometric<br />

characteristics were selected for the experiments, which consisted in 2 grasping tasks<br />

with each bottle and 2 different filling levels (L1 and L2), all of them carried out<br />

randomly within the same session (4 bottles x 2 tasks x 2 filling levels). The tasks were:<br />

to move the bottle to a different position (T1) and to pour the bottle content into a<br />

recipient (T2). Each experiment implied 5 repetitions of the same task, bottle and filling<br />

level, carried out after a rehearsal session (5 identical tests). The subjects were asked to<br />

perform the tasks in a natural way. A right-hand Cyberglove was used to collect hand<br />

postures during the grasping experiments, after a proper calibration [16] in every<br />

session. The glove provides the main joint angles of the hand with an acquisition rate of<br />

15Hz. The Cyberglove system has been proved to be valid for the measurement of<br />

hand postures during grasping tasks, ranging its sensors’ repeatability errors from 1.2º<br />

to 5º. In a previous grasping characterization study [17] it was stated that the hand<br />

posture was repeatable for the same subject, bottle, filling level and task. Fig 1b<br />

displays an image of the glove with the abbreviations used for the joint angles studied in<br />

this work: thumb and index finger metacarpophalangeal joints (MCP1,2), proximal<br />

interphalangeal joint of the index finger (PIP2), interphalangeal joint of the thumb (IP1)<br />

and rotation and ab/adduction of the thumb carpometacarpal joint (ROLL, ABD1).<br />

Table 1 shows the bottles’ features: identification, material, height (h), diameter at<br />

contact area (d), empty weight (W0), and weights at filling levels 1 (W1) and 2 (W2).<br />

Table 2 shows the subjects’ data, including hand breadth (HB) and hand length (HL).<br />

These hand parameters, also displayed in Fig. 2a, are representative of the hand size and<br />

are used for scalability purposes in the grasp model developed in [3]. Fig.2b shows an<br />

image of one of the 16 experiments. Table 3 shows the 16 experiments. Each one<br />

implied 5 new input-target sequences, yielding a set of 480 data sequences. A statistical<br />

analysis over the output data standard deviations (SD) was done. For each joint angle<br />

and experiment (8 different experiments as the filling level is not significant), the SD<br />

was computed. The mean, standard deviation and maximum values were computed for<br />

the 48 SD values in order to compare the ANN errors with the deviations of real data.<br />

Table 1. Features of the bottles employed in the experiments.<br />

Bottle ID Material h(m) d(m) W0(kg) W1(kg) W2(kg)<br />

B1 glass 0.300 0.08 0.5235 0.550 1.00<br />

B2 plastic 0.350 0.08 0.0490 0.150 0.55<br />

B3 plastic 0.245 0.075 0.0445 0.150 0.55<br />

B4 Plastic 0.222 0.065 0.0285 0.150 0.55<br />

Table 2. Features of the subjects participating in the experiments.<br />

Subject ID Gender Age Height(m) Weight(kg) HL(m) HB(m)<br />

S1 Male 47 0.174 82 0.186 0.088<br />

S2 Male 38 0.185 78 0.202 0.081<br />

S3 Female 28 0.164 69 0.165 0.077<br />

S4 Male 40 0.173 84 0.190 0.086<br />

S5 Male 25 0.177 76 0.195 0.085<br />

S6 Female 35 0.171 60 0.180 0.080

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!