27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

instead the femur was supported by a system of muscles (18) and ligaments (5)<br />

modelled as simple connector elements. Each point not lying on the femur was assumed<br />

to be fixed at its origin in space (Fig. 1b and 1d).<br />

Muscle and ligament origin/insertion points for the lower limb were obtained from a<br />

recent study [14]. These points were then scaled to suite the geometry of the composite<br />

femur using techniques described by brand et al 1982 [15]. Due to size and location<br />

some muscles had to be represented with more than one origin point in space (e.g.<br />

Gluteus maximus). A number of beam elements were also employed with a high<br />

stiffness in compression to facilitate the transfer of the patella-femoral force from the<br />

muscles and ligaments to the distal femur. A linear elastic force-displacement<br />

relationship was considered for each connector element in this study, with muscle<br />

stiffness values being determined for each connector element based on available data<br />

from a previous study [7].<br />

4. RESULT<br />

a b c d<br />

Figure 1: Restrained (a, c) and musculoskeletal boundary conditions (b, d) for<br />

intact femur and TS implanted femur with 4mm lateral offset.<br />

To investigate the influence of FE boundary conditions on the stresses in the intact<br />

femur a number of transverse sections at 50mm intervals were taken along the shaft of<br />

both models (Fig. 2). These transverse sections showed that the femur restrained at the<br />

mid-shaft was subject to significantly higher cortical stresses (particularly in regions 3-4<br />

close to the fixed boundary) when compared to the femur supported by muscle and<br />

ligaments structures, which had a much more uniform stress distribution along the shaft.<br />

In contrast the stress distribution in the distal femur was observed to be very similar for<br />

both models suggesting that the fixed boundary conditions have minimal influence in<br />

regions close to the point of load application. Cancellous bone stresses were also found<br />

to be quite similar for both models, due to the majority of the cancellous structure being<br />

located in the distal most region of the femur.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!