27.12.2012 Views

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

ARUP; ISBN: 978-0-9562121-5-3 - CMBBE 2012 - Cardiff University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

current study to explore the effect of friction variations on pile-up using a 3D model of<br />

the Berkovich tip with the finding that less friction leads to greater pile-up. The 3D<br />

modelling in this study suggests that not only may the pile-up height be underestimated<br />

by neglecting to consider friction between the indenter and the bone, but also the shape<br />

of the residual pile-up may differ (as demonstrated in Figure 5).<br />

Finally, we note that the models used in this study adopt idealised representations of the<br />

bone tissue constitutive behaviour. It is established that bone exhibits anisotropy with<br />

respect to tissue-level mechanical properties [5]. Bone tissue is also known to exhibit<br />

time-dependent (e.g. viscoelastic [3]) properties, which were not addressed in this study.<br />

6. CONCLUSIONS & FUTURE WORK<br />

This numerical study of high-load nanoindentation of bone tissue suggests that threedimensional<br />

FEA of bone nanoindentation, while being more computationally<br />

expensive than 2D axisymmetric models, may be advantageous in investigating the<br />

post-yield behaviour of bone tissue.<br />

We are currently collecting experimental data on the high-load nanoindentation of<br />

trabecular bone samples, including observations of pile-up. This data will then be used<br />

to evaluate existing proposed constitutive material models to describe the post-yield<br />

properties of trabecular bone tissue, including appropriate consideration of friction<br />

between the bone and indenter, and pile-up prediction.<br />

7. REFERENCES<br />

1. Burr, D. Microdamage and bone strength. Osteoporosis Int., 2003, Vol 14, S67-S72.<br />

2. Seeman, E., and Delmas, P. D., Bone quality – the material and structural basis of<br />

bone strength and fragility. N. Engl. J. Med., 2006, Vol. 354, 2250-2261.<br />

3. Tai, K., Ulm, F., and Ortiz, C. Nanogranular origins of the strength of bone. Nano<br />

Lett, 2006, Vol. 6, 2520-2525.<br />

4. Mullins, L. P., Bruzzi, M. S. and McHugh, P. E., Calibration of a constitutive model<br />

for the post-yield behavior of cortical bone. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2009,<br />

Vol. 2, 460-470.<br />

5. Carnelli, D., Gastaldi, D., Sassi, V., Contro, R., Ortiz, C. and Vena, P. A finite<br />

element model for direction-dependent mechanical response to nanoindentation of<br />

cortical bone allowing for anisotropic post-yield behavior of the tissue. J. Biomech.<br />

Eng., 2010, Vol. 132, 081008.<br />

6. Adam, C. and Swain, M. V. The effect of friction on indenter force and pile-up in<br />

numerical simulations of bone nanoindentation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater<br />

2011, Vol. 4, 1554-1558.<br />

7. Lichinchi, M., Lenardi, C., Haupt, J. and Vitali, R. Simulation of Berkovich<br />

nanoindentation experiments on thin films using finite element method. Thin Solid<br />

Films, 1998, Vol. 312, 240-248.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!